Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 11801–11810

EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other18 papers

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others in the field

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the Director's finding that the judging criterion was met. The letters stating the Petitioner served as a 'member of jury' were not corroborated by documentation of his responsibilities or details about the competitions, and photographs with handwritten captions were insufficient. Without corroborating evidence, AAO could not determine that his role involved judging the work of others in his field.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that the judging criterion was met. The letters stating the Petitioner served as a 'member of jury' were not corroborated by documentation of his responsibilities or details about the competitions, and photographs with handwritten captions were insufficient. Without corroborating evidence, AAO could not determine that his role involved judging the work of others in his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-12_02_B2203; source_row=27319
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other18 papers

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner claimed his major contribution was initiating rock climbing in Nepal, including opening 19 climbing routes. AAO found that the testimonial letters lacked specific detail about how his contributions were original and of major significance, newspaper articles indicated broader private-sector involvement in route development, and the record did not support that he was the sole initiator of rock climbing in Nepal.…

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner claimed his major contribution was initiating rock climbing in Nepal, including opening 19 climbing routes. AAO found that the testimonial letters lacked specific detail about how his contributions were original and of major significance, newspaper articles indicated broader private-sector involvement in route development, and the record did not support that he was the sole initiator of rock climbing in Nepal. The newly submitted NMIA evidence about training course development was introduced without prior claim and lacked corroboration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-12_02_B2203; source_row=27320
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other18 papers

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material in professional or major trade publications or major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner submitted 18 articles from various Nepali publications. While many articles were about him and met other formal requirements, the Petitioner failed to establish that the publications qualify as professional or major trade publications or major media.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted 18 articles from various Nepali publications. While many articles were about him and met other formal requirements, the Petitioner failed to establish that the publications qualify as professional or major trade publications or major media. Press Council Nepal's grading letter lacked explanation of the grading criteria, circulation statistics were absent or uncontextualized, and publisher letters did not supply sufficient comparative data.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-12_02_B2203; source_row=27318
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other18 papers

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-12_02_B2203; source_row=27321
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other18 papers

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards or prizes

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner satisfied the awards criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner satisfied the awards criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-12_02_B2203; source_row=27316
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the petitioner in professional or major trade publications or other major media

What the decision said

AAO did not separately decide this criterion, instead reserving it and considering the related evidence in the final merits determination.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately decide this criterion, instead reserving it and considering the related evidence in the final merits determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-12_01_B2203; source_row=27311
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination - sustained acclaim and top of field

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found, on de novo review of the totality of the evidence, that the Petitioner has sustained national and international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the top of his field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found, on de novo review of the totality of the evidence, that the Petitioner has sustained national and international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-12_01_B2203; source_row=27315
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

other

Minimum requirements accurately reflected on labor certification

What the decision said

The Petitioner did not address this issue on appeal, so AAO affirmed the Director's finding and considered the issue waived.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not address this issue on appeal, so AAO affirmed the Director's finding and considered the issue waived.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-07_01_B5203; source_row=27309
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

other

Bona fide permanent, full-time job offer

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the Work Order and Vendor letter evidenced a temporary project assignment rather than permanent, full-time employment. Counsel's unsubstantiated assertions that the work order might be extended did not constitute evidence. The industry-specific job duties tied to a single biotechnology client's trials further undermined any claim of broader, permanent employment intent.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Work Order and Vendor letter evidenced a temporary project assignment rather than permanent, full-time employment. Counsel's unsubstantiated assertions that the work order might be extended did not constitute evidence. The industry-specific job duties tied to a single biotechnology client's trials further undermined any claim of broader, permanent employment intent.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-07_01_B5203; source_row=27308
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Although the Petitioner referenced a charter, no such charter or similar documentation was submitted. The membership certificate and a general website screenshot do not demonstrate the requirements or criteria for obtaining membership, including that outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts are required.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner referenced a charter, no such charter or similar documentation was submitted. The membership certificate and a general website screenshot do not demonstrate the requirements or criteria for obtaining membership, including that outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts are required.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-05_01_B2203; source_row=27290
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment