Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11831–11840
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIManagerPhD20 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's achievements — though real and significant — do not establish he has reached the level of sustained national or international acclaim required. Media acclaim attached to collaborative research resided with the lab and senior researchers; citation counts were uncontextualized; the Best Paper Award lacked corroboration; and company recognition did not reflect individual acclaim for the Petitioner.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's achievements — though real and significant — do not establish he has reached the level of sustained national or international acclaim required. Media acclaim attached to collaborative research resided with the lab and senior researchers; citation counts were uncontextualized; the Best Paper Award lacked corroboration; and company recognition did not reflect individual acclaim for the Petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-29_01_B2203; source_row=27285 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the record supports that the Petitioner co-authored articles published in scientific journals and conference proceedings including International Journal of Robotics Research, Science Robotics, and IEEE Transactions on Robotics.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the record supports that the Petitioner co-authored articles published in scientific journals and conference proceedings including International Journal of Robotics Research, Science Robotics, and IEEE Transactions on Robotics.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-29_01_B2203; source_row=27283 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIManagerPhD20 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director underweighted the expert letters. The letters provided sufficient detail, supported by corroborating evidence, to establish the nature and significance of the Petitioner's contributions to robotics projects adopted by NASA JPL and other top university labs.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director underweighted the expert letters. The letters provided sufficient detail, supported by corroborating evidence, to establish the nature and significance of the Petitioner's contributions to robotics projects adopted by NASA JPL and other top university labs.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-29_01_B2203; source_row=27282 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIManagerPhD20 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the Director applied an improper standard by penalizing the company's limited longevity, which is contrary to USCIS guidance. AAO also noted that whether a leading role reflects placement at the top of the field is a final merits question, not required by the plain language of the criterion. AAO found sufficient industry and media recognition to establish a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Director applied an improper standard by penalizing the company's limited longevity, which is contrary to USCIS guidance. AAO also noted that whether a leading role reflects placement at the top of the field is a final merits question, not required by the plain language of the criterion. AAO found sufficient industry and media recognition to establish a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-29_01_B2203; source_row=27284 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed additional evidence was needed to demonstrate the lecture qualified as an artistic exhibition or showcase, and Petitioner did not articulate why the Director's determination was incorrect.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed additional evidence was needed to demonstrate the lecture qualified as an artistic exhibition or showcase, and Petitioner did not articulate why the Director's determination was incorrect.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_10_B2203; source_row=27271 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination - sustained acclaim and top of field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO conducted an aggregate review and found the record does not show sustained national or international acclaim or placement at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO conducted an aggregate review and found the record does not show sustained national or international acclaim or placement at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_10_B2203; source_row=27272 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the letters praise originality but lack specific, probative explanation of how Petitioner's work has had a major impact in the field, often using general or hyperbolic language or describing only future potential. Other evidence (media, awards, Instagram following) was not linked to major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the letters praise originality but lack specific, probative explanation of how Petitioner's work has had a major impact in the field, often using general or hyperbolic language or describing only future potential. Other evidence (media, awards, Instagram following) was not linked to major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_10_B2203; source_row=27270 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner submitted website links (not proper evidence), a TV interview letter lacking viewership data to establish major medium status, and newspaper articles without comparative circulation data to demonstrate they qualify as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted website links (not proper evidence), a TV interview letter lacking viewership data to establish major medium status, and newspaper articles without comparative circulation data to demonstrate they qualify as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_08_B2203; source_row=27256 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner claimed membership in SAG-AFTRA, the Producers Guild of America, and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, but failed to establish actual membership in SAG-AFTRA and failed to show that any of these associations require outstanding achievements as a condition of membership.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner claimed membership in SAG-AFTRA, the Producers Guild of America, and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, but failed to establish actual membership in SAG-AFTRA and failed to show that any of these associations require outstanding achievements as a condition of membership.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_08_B2203; source_row=27255 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c