Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11841–11850
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not dispute the Director's findings regarding her contributions and failed to demonstrate that any referenced paper or work constitutes a contribution of major significance to the field of television and motion picture production.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not dispute the Director's findings regarding her contributions and failed to demonstrate that any referenced paper or work constitutes a contribution of major significance to the field of television and motion picture production.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_08_B2203; source_row=27258 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Beneficiary's 2019 salary of $79,194 was above average for coaches (average range $48,090–$58,400), it fell between the 75th percentile ($73,640) and 90th percentile ($100,730), which was not sufficient to establish that her salary was high in relation to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Beneficiary's 2019 salary of $79,194 was above average for coaches (average range $48,090–$58,400), it fell between the 75th percentile ($73,640) and 90th percentile ($100,730), which was not sufficient to establish that her salary was high in relation to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_06_B2203; source_row=27245 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that many submitted articles merely mentioned the Beneficiary in passing rather than being about her, and that the Petitioner failed to establish that The Peninsula, Woman magazine, or Abode qualify as major media, noting insufficient circulation data and that self-promotional publisher claims are not reliable evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that many submitted articles merely mentioned the Beneficiary in passing rather than being about her, and that the Petitioner failed to establish that The Peninsula, Woman magazine, or Abode qualify as major media, noting insufficient circulation data and that self-promotional publisher claims are not reliable evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_06_B2203; source_row=27243 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Beneficiary may have played a critical role at the sports academy, the Petitioner failed to establish that the academy has a distinguished reputation, as the evidence was largely self-promotional. Regarding the Petitioner's own organization, the letters showed she was a member of the coaching team but not in a leading or critical role.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Beneficiary may have played a critical role at the sports academy, the Petitioner failed to establish that the academy has a distinguished reputation, as the evidence was largely self-promotional. Regarding the Petitioner's own organization, the letters showed she was a member of the coaching team but not in a leading or critical role. New evidence about a regional coaching role was not considered as it was first submitted on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_06_B2203; source_row=27244 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's characterization of the memberships as 'not germane' but nonetheless found that the evidence did not establish that membership in any of the claimed associations required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts, as the letters did not specify achievement requirements or identify the selectors as recognized national/international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's characterization of the memberships as 'not germane' but nonetheless found that the evidence did not establish that membership in any of the claimed associations required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts, as the letters did not specify achievement requirements or identify the selectors as recognized national/international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_06_B2203; source_row=27242 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AIProfessor20 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the expert letters provided technical descriptions and general praise without specific probative analysis of major significance; citation statistics did not automatically establish major significance without contextual evidence; patent evidence lacked explanation of field impact; company product and collaborative research evidence was insufficient to demonstrate major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the expert letters provided technical descriptions and general praise without specific probative analysis of major significance; citation statistics did not automatically establish major significance without contextual evidence; patent evidence lacked explanation of field impact; company product and collaborative research evidence was insufficient to demonstrate major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_01_B2203; source_row=27215 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The undated letter setting forth terms of payment did not adequately document actual salary and remuneration earned; the SimplyHired data acknowledged salaries 'can vary greatly' and did not provide information on high salaries for comparison; and counsel's assertion about earning 10-20 times local salaries does not constitute evidence. The Petitioner also failed to provide comparative salary data for his 2017 U.S. earnings.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The undated letter setting forth terms of payment did not adequately document actual salary and remuneration earned; the SimplyHired data acknowledged salaries 'can vary greatly' and did not provide information on high salaries for comparison; and counsel's assertion about earning 10-20 times local salaries does not constitute evidence. The Petitioner also failed to provide comparative salary data for his 2017 U.S. earnings.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_09_B2203; source_row=27265 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the National Rails Award was not given for excellence in journalism but rather to recognize leadership in the rail industry. The evidence did not establish that the award is nationally or internationally recognized in the field of journalism.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the National Rails Award was not given for excellence in journalism but rather to recognize leadership in the rail industry. The evidence did not establish that the award is nationally or internationally recognized in the field of journalism.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_02_B2203; source_row=27220 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work in the field at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the book at issue was not work in the field of journalism, and the book launch event was not an artistic exhibition or showcase but rather a commercial promotion event. Newspapers and business conferences are similarly not artistic in nature.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the book at issue was not work in the field of journalism, and the book launch event was not an artistic exhibition or showcase but rather a commercial promotion event. Newspapers and business conferences are similarly not artistic in nature.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_02_B2203; source_row=27223 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
participation as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the fact a journalist specializes in writing about a subject does not make that subject an allied field to journalism. The finalists for the award were rail management and companies, not journalists, and the record did not show the Petitioner judged the work of any journalists.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the fact a journalist specializes in writing about a subject does not make that subject an allied field to journalism. The finalists for the award were rail management and companies, not journalists, and the record did not show the Petitioner judged the work of any journalists.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-26_02_B2203; source_row=27222 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c