Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found that based on the Beneficiary's Bachelor of Technology and Post-Graduate Diploma in Management, along with the equivalency evaluation, the Beneficiary met the minimum educational requirement of the labor certification and the EB-2 advanced degree professional classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that based on the Beneficiary's Bachelor of Technology and Post-Graduate Diploma in Management, along with the equivalency evaluation, the Beneficiary met the minimum educational requirement of the labor certification and the EB-2 advanced degree professional classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-19_01_B5203; source_row=27186 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the Beneficiary's authorship of scholarly articles was established, though noted only one article relates to the Beneficiary's current field of radiology.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Beneficiary's authorship of scholarly articles was established, though noted only one article relates to the Beneficiary's current field of radiology.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=27190 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major media
What the decision said
The AAO reserved the published-material criterion because detailed discussion of it could not change the outcome of the appeal given the Petitioner already failed to meet the three-criteria threshold.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO reserved the published-material criterion because detailed discussion of it could not change the outcome of the appeal given the Petitioner already failed to meet the three-criteria threshold.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-19_03_B2203; source_row=27193 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
The AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the record does not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the record does not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-19_03_B2203; source_row=27199 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
admissibility under section 212(a)(5)(B) / national or international renown exemption under section 101(a)(41)
What the decision said
AAO did not resolve the merits of the renown-physician exemption; it withdrew the Director's decision and remanded for further proceedings and a new decision.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not resolve the merits of the renown-physician exemption; it withdrew the Director's decision and remanded for further proceedings and a new decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-18_01_B5203; source_row=27181 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO determined that 'data scientists' was the most accurate occupational match for the Beneficiary, and using county-level careeronestop.org data for that occupation showed her $160,000 salary was above average but below the 90th percentile ($192,240), thus not high relative to similarly situated scientists.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO determined that 'data scientists' was the most accurate occupational match for the Beneficiary, and using county-level careeronestop.org data for that occupation showed her $160,000 salary was above average but below the 90th percentile ($192,240), thus not high relative to similarly situated scientists.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-15_01_B2203; source_row=27179 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While acknowledging the originality of the Beneficiary's work, AAO found that the record did not establish it was of major significance. Her contributions to the weather model were among many updates by numerous researchers, her Google Scholar citations lacked comparative context, and the evidence did not show her work widely impacted others in her specific field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
While acknowledging the originality of the Beneficiary's work, AAO found that the record did not establish it was of major significance. Her contributions to the weather model were among many updates by numerous researchers, her Google Scholar citations lacked comparative context, and the evidence did not show her work widely impacted others in her specific field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-15_01_B2203; source_row=27176 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the peer review emails showing the Beneficiary actually completed reviews for journals such as Agronomy, Sustainability, and Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan established this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the peer review emails showing the Beneficiary actually completed reviews for journals such as Agronomy, Sustainability, and Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan established this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-15_01_B2203; source_row=27175 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c