Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director's requirement of distinguishing her role from other company scientists was not required, but still found the evidence insufficient because it did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's individual impact on the Petitioner's or its parent company's overall global operations, nor the extent to which her work was part of a larger team effort.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director's requirement of distinguishing her role from other company scientists was not required, but still found the evidence insufficient because it did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's individual impact on the Petitioner's or its parent company's overall global operations, nor the extent to which her work was part of a larger team effort.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-15_01_B2203; source_row=27178 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
The website articles were about the research project, not the Beneficiary, and the monograph chapters merely cited her work among hundreds of other scientists without providing additional information about her specifically.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The website articles were about the research project, not the Beneficiary, and the monograph chapters merely cited her work among hundreds of other scientists without providing additional information about her specifically.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-15_01_B2203; source_row=27174 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the aggregate that the record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the aggregate that the record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-15_01_B2203; source_row=27180 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner conflated the importance of the petroleum engineering industry with the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor. The record lacked sufficient documentation of the prospective impact of the Petitioner's proposed improvements, whether they had been adopted by others, or what original innovations he contributed that were implemented by other companies beyond his own employer's projects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner conflated the importance of the petroleum engineering industry with the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor. The record lacked sufficient documentation of the prospective impact of the Petitioner's proposed improvements, whether they had been adopted by others, or what original innovations he contributed that were implemented by other companies beyond his own employer's projects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-12_04_B5203; source_row=27160 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner provided no supporting evidence, such as membership requirements, to establish that ABADA-Capoeira is a professional association within the regulatory definition requiring a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its equivalent as a minimum for entry into the occupation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner provided no supporting evidence, such as membership requirements, to establish that ABADA-Capoeira is a professional association within the regulatory definition requiring a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its equivalent as a minimum for entry into the occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-12_05_B5203; source_row=27166 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the new letters described speaking engagements occurring after the petition filing date and after the Director's decision, and thus could not establish eligibility at the time of filing. Other evidence either was not new, did not address the proposed endeavor as articulated at filing, or related to past work relevant to prong two rather than national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the new letters described speaking engagements occurring after the petition filing date and after the Director's decision, and thus could not establish eligibility at the time of filing. Other evidence either was not new, did not address the proposed endeavor as articulated at filing, or related to past work relevant to prong two rather than national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-12_06_B5203; source_row=27171 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the record does not establish advanced degree qualification and that the Director's failure to address this threshold question rendered the decision insufficient for review, warranting remand.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the record does not establish advanced degree qualification and that the Director's failure to address this threshold question rendered the decision insufficient for review, warranting remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-12_02_B5203; source_row=27153 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded after reviewing the entire record that, on balance, waiving the job offer and labor certification requirements would benefit the United States.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded after reviewing the entire record that, on balance, waiving the job offer and labor certification requirements would benefit the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-12_03_B5203; source_row=27159 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c