Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 11941–11950
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
Salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner submitted only a single month's earnings statement which is not representative of his routine salary, and provided no documentation comparing his earnings to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted only a single month's earnings statement which is not representative of his routine salary, and provided no documentation comparing his earnings to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-08_01_B5203; source_row=27147 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
Ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concurred that the attestation from the Deputy Resident Director establishes that the Petitioner has been employed since 2001 and has at least ten years of full-time experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concurred that the attestation from the Deputy Resident Director establishes that the Petitioner has been employed since 2001 and has at least ten years of full-time experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-08_01_B5203; source_row=27145 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Certificate of Appreciation recognizes only length of service with the employer, not achievements or significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Certificate of Appreciation recognizes only length of service with the employer, not achievements or significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-08_01_B5203; source_row=27149 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the Petitioner identified a wide variety of possible research topics but did not provide sufficient information to establish which specific research area he would pursue in the United States, nor did he identify specific projects to mitigate global warming or climate change. The record lacked documentation of prospective impact or potential economic effects rising to national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner identified a wide variety of possible research topics but did not provide sufficient information to establish which specific research area he would pursue in the United States, nor did he identify specific projects to mitigate global warming or climate change. The record lacked documentation of prospective impact or potential economic effects rising to national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-05_01_B5203; source_row=27141 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the record in the aggregate does not establish that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field or has the required sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the record in the aggregate does not establish that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field or has the required sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-04_01_B2203; source_row=27140 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the CWA Management Measures only vaguely describe senior membership requirements and do not sufficiently establish that outstanding achievements are required. Additionally, the record does not show that those judging membership applications are recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the CWA Management Measures only vaguely describe senior membership requirements and do not sufficiently establish that outstanding achievements are required. Additionally, the record does not show that those judging membership applications are recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-04_01_B2203; source_row=27138 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c