Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found the petitioner satisfied the basic elements of the judging criterion because she provided untranslated emails demonstrating she judged three competitions and a publication listing her as a juror. AAO noted the translation issues cited by the director were not applicable to the emails.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner satisfied the basic elements of the judging criterion because she provided untranslated emails demonstrating she judged three competitions and a publication listing her as a juror. AAO noted the translation issues cited by the director were not applicable to the emails.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-03_03_B2203; source_row=27125 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the criterion met based on the Petitioner's roles at his employer, where he rose to creative director and lead designer and the company had received multiple notable awards. However, the criterion was not met as to the two client organizations due to lack of probative corroborating evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the criterion met based on the Petitioner's roles at his employer, where he rose to creative director and lead designer and the company had received multiple notable awards. However, the criterion was not met as to the two client organizations due to lack of probative corroborating evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-03_04_B2203; source_row=27134 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner was the recipient of two nationally recognized prizes for excellence in his field, and that minor participation limitations did not disqualify the awards under the plain language of the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner was the recipient of two nationally recognized prizes for excellence in his field, and that minor participation limitations did not disqualify the awards under the plain language of the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-03_04_B2203; source_row=27130 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
The AAO did not reach a final merits conclusion itself; it found the Director's analysis inadequate and remanded for a new decision considering the totality of the record.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO did not reach a final merits conclusion itself; it found the Director's analysis inadequate and remanded for a new decision considering the totality of the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-03_02_B2203; source_row=27122 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO previously determined in the underlying appeal that the Petitioner established he received nationally recognized awards or prizes in kickboxing; this finding was not contested on motion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO previously determined in the underlying appeal that the Petitioner established he received nationally recognized awards or prizes in kickboxing; this finding was not contested on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-03_01_B2203; source_row=27118 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that actorsentertainment.com lacked sufficient comparative data to establish it as a major medium, that the argument any article by a professional writer constitutes a 'professional publication' was unpersuasive, and that the bulk of submitted articles either were not about the Petitioner, lacked required elements (date, title, author), or related to her prior broadcasting career rather than acting.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that actorsentertainment.com lacked sufficient comparative data to establish it as a major medium, that the argument any article by a professional writer constitutes a 'professional publication' was unpersuasive, and that the bulk of submitted articles either were not about the Petitioner, lacked required elements (date, title, author), or related to her prior broadcasting career rather than acting.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=27110 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that a television series that has not yet found a distributor, filmed an episode, or aired cannot satisfy the major significance requirement. Projections of potential artistic and economic impact are insufficient; the contribution must already have been widely implemented or remarkably impacted the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that a television series that has not yet found a distributor, filmed an episode, or aired cannot satisfy the major significance requirement. Projections of potential artistic and economic impact are insufficient; the contribution must already have been widely implemented or remarkably impacted the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=27112 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or other significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that earning 10% above standard SAG-AFTRA scale does not establish a high salary in relation to other television and movie actors. The record lacked evidence of total annual earnings, and the Petitioner's hourly/daily rates were at or just above standard union scale. Comparative Canadian salary data was insufficient for her Canadian work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that earning 10% above standard SAG-AFTRA scale does not establish a high salary in relation to other television and movie actors. The record lacked evidence of total annual earnings, and the Petitioner's hourly/daily rates were at or just above standard union scale. Comparative Canadian salary data was insufficient for her Canadian work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=27115 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c