Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 12021–12030

NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

membership in professional associations

Why AAO was not persuaded

The membership certificates for the International Association of Emergency Managers and the Global Society of Homeland and National Security Professionals post-dated the filing of the petition. The training course account information was for a training institution, not a professional association.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The membership certificates for the International Association of Emergency Managers and the Global Society of Homeland and National Security Professionals post-dated the filing of the petition. The training course account information was for a training institution, not a professional association.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-26_03_B5203; source_row=27040
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO explicitly declined to reach prong 2 because failure on prong 1 was dispositive.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong 2 because failure on prong 1 was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-26_03_B5203; source_row=27043
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner on appeal did not specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's findings, did not reference the Director's discussion, and did not identify the supporting evidence, failing to overcome the Director's findings.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner on appeal did not specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's findings, did not reference the Director's discussion, and did not identify the supporting evidence, failing to overcome the Director's findings.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-26_03_B5203; source_row=27041
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO explicitly declined to reach prong 3 because failure on prong 1 was dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong 3 because failure on prong 1 was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-26_03_B5203; source_row=27044
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO did not dispute the Director's finding that this criterion was met; it is noted as one of the criteria the Director credited.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not dispute the Director's finding that this criterion was met; it is noted as one of the criteria the Director credited.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-26_07_B2203; source_row=27072
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / ManagementPhysician

Issue evaluated

ten years experience

ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees the original letters did not establish full-time employment, and declines to consider new full-time letters first submitted on appeal under Matter of Soriano and Matter of Obaigbena.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the original letters did not establish full-time employment, and declines to consider new full-time letters first submitted on appeal under Matter of Soriano and Matter of Obaigbena.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-26_01_B5203; source_row=27022
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and AAO agreed this criterion was satisfied based on the Beneficiary's published papers.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed this criterion was satisfied based on the Beneficiary's published papers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-26_03_B2203; source_row=27034
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

What the decision said

Because the Petitioner failed to meet enough other criteria, detailed discussion of this criterion could not change the outcome, so the AAO reserved the issue.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to meet enough other criteria, detailed discussion of this criterion could not change the outcome, so the AAO reserved the issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-26_08_B2203; source_row=27080
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

participation as a judge of the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and the AAO agreed that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and the AAO agreed that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-26_08_B2203; source_row=27079
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display at artistic exhibitions or showcases

What the decision said

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusions regarding this criterion on appeal, so the AAO considered the issue abandoned.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusions regarding this criterion on appeal, so the AAO considered the issue abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-26_08_B2203; source_row=27082
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment