Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12041–12050
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical EngineeringResearcher
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the Step 1 threshold of three criteria. AAO nonetheless observed the record did not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the Step 1 threshold of three criteria. AAO nonetheless observed the record did not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-26_02_B2203; source_row=27028 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's logic would make anyone quoted by media a critical role performer. The record establishes her leading role at her own business but not that the business has a distinguished reputation; follower counts lacked comparative context and the cited articles merely listed her clinic as one option among others.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's logic would make anyone quoted by media a critical role performer. The record establishes her leading role at her own business but not that the business has a distinguished reputation; follower counts lacked comparative context and the cited articles merely listed her clinic as one option among others.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=27017 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The commercial successes criterion concerns the commercial success of projects the individual participated in (e.g., box office receipts), not personal income which is already covered by criterion (ix). The Petitioner identified no analogous projects and submitted no comparable evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The commercial successes criterion concerns the commercial success of projects the individual participated in (e.g., box office receipts), not personal income which is already covered by criterion (ix). The Petitioner identified no analogous projects and submitted no comparable evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=27019 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The regulation requires the exhibition or showcase to be 'artistic,' which the Petitioner's appearances were not. Moreover, the Petitioner's participation in the promotion of suppliers' products does not transform those events into a display of the Petitioner's own work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The regulation requires the exhibition or showcase to be 'artistic,' which the Petitioner's appearances were not. Moreover, the Petitioner's participation in the promotion of suppliers' products does not transform those events into a display of the Petitioner's own work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=27016 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Eight of fourteen letters were identically worded, suggesting common authorship by the Petitioner. None of the letters identified specific original contributions or explained their major significance. Use of technology developed by others and passing along existing information are not original contributions.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Eight of fourteen letters were identically worded, suggesting common authorship by the Petitioner. None of the letters identified specific original contributions or explained their major significance. Use of technology developed by others and passing along existing information are not original contributions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=27014 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Screenshots without transcripts were insufficient to show the broadcasts were about the Petitioner rather than general commentary. Most print materials were promotional rather than media coverage, and the one identifiable print article lacked a complete translation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Screenshots without transcripts were insufficient to show the broadcasts were about the Petitioner rather than general commentary. Most print materials were promotional rather than media coverage, and the one identifiable print article lacked a complete translation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=27013 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other13 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that low and uncontextualized citation counts, journal impact factors that do not confer individual acclaim, letters from connected individuals lacking objective support, overstated claims about the VVR score recognition and AHA committee, and ACCM Fellow status that can be earned through only regional impact collectively failed to establish the Beneficiary's sustained national or international acclaim or membersh…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that low and uncontextualized citation counts, journal impact factors that do not confer individual acclaim, letters from connected individuals lacking objective support, overstated claims about the VVR score recognition and AHA committee, and ACCM Fellow status that can be earned through only regional impact collectively failed to establish the Beneficiary's sustained national or international acclaim or membership in the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-25_01_B2203; source_row=27012 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold evidentiary requirement of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record did not support the required level of acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold evidentiary requirement of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record did not support the required level of acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-25_02_B2203; source_row=27020 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO conducted the final merits determination and found the Petitioner's evidence—reference letters, exhibition coverage, publications, an award, and judging roles—collectively demonstrated peer respect but fell short of showing sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO conducted the final merits determination and found the Petitioner's evidence—reference letters, exhibition coverage, publications, an award, and judging roles—collectively demonstrated peer respect but fell short of showing sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-02-17_02_B2203; source_row=27003 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c