Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly stated it need not conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the required number of criteria. It did note in dicta that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly stated it need not conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the required number of criteria. It did note in dicta that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_07_B2203; source_row=26898 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO affirmed the Director's finding that this criterion was met, consistent with letters from employers establishing the Petitioner's critical capacity.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding that this criterion was met, consistent with letters from employers establishing the Petitioner's critical capacity.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_07_B2203; source_row=26896 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO previously withdrew the Director's finding because the original evidence (an invitation and reminder e-mail) did not show completed peer review. New evidence on motion documents that the Petitioner completed peer review activities for the journals, satisfying the criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO previously withdrew the Director's finding because the original evidence (an invitation and reminder e-mail) did not show completed peer review. New evidence on motion documents that the Petitioner completed peer review activities for the journals, satisfying the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_09_B2203; source_row=26907 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
continued work in the area of extraordinary ability
What the decision said
AAO agreed there are substantial concerns about the bona fides of the contract (including a clause voiding it if no extraordinary-ability visa is obtained, and a short term ending January 1, 2020), but found the Director's reasons were not stated with sufficient specificity to allow a meaningful response.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed there are substantial concerns about the bona fides of the contract (including a clause voiding it if no extraordinary-ability visa is obtained, and a short term ending January 1, 2020), but found the Director's reasons were not stated with sufficient specificity to allow a meaningful response.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_03_B2203; source_row=26880 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination - sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO rejected the Petitioner's reading of Kazarian but also found the Director's final merits analysis deficient for focusing on quantity rather than content of evidence; the issue is remanded for further analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO rejected the Petitioner's reading of Kazarian but also found the Director's final merits analysis deficient for focusing on quantity rather than content of evidence; the issue is remanded for further analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_03_B2203; source_row=26879 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c