Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Biomedical / Life SciencesManager18 papers18 reviews
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Awards
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
What the decision said
The Petitioner initially claimed this criterion but did not contest the Director's denial of it on appeal; the evidence was considered in the final merits determination instead.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner initially claimed this criterion but did not contest the Director's denial of it on appeal; the evidence was considered in the final merits determination instead.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-31_08_B2203; source_row=26813 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life SciencesManager18 papers18 reviews
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion based on evidence of his leading roles at a company with a distinguished reputation in its industry.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion based on evidence of his leading roles at a company with a distinguished reputation in its industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-31_08_B2203; source_row=26817 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Biomedical / Life SciencesManager18 papers18 reviews
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Scholarly authorship
authorship of scholarly articles
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion based on his publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion based on his publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-31_08_B2203; source_row=26816 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that SACVEN's role is the protection of artists' intellectual property rights and that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the association requires outstanding achievements judged by experts. On appeal the Petitioner did not address the substantive issue.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that SACVEN's role is the protection of artists' intellectual property rights and that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the association requires outstanding achievements judged by experts. On appeal the Petitioner did not address the substantive issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-30_01_B2203; source_row=26771 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning that an award to the group excludes the Petitioner, but found the more fundamental issue that the Petitioner submitted no independent evidence of the award's national or international recognition, relying only on self-serving promotional material from the awarding entity's own website.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning that an award to the group excludes the Petitioner, but found the more fundamental issue that the Petitioner submitted no independent evidence of the award's national or international recognition, relying only on self-serving promotional material from the awarding entity's own website.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-30_01_B2203; source_row=26770 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Most articles refer to the band collectively, not the Petitioner individually. Translations were incomplete, only one article mentioned the Petitioner by name (and only in a list of band members), and the Petitioner did not explain how website rankings established qualifying media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Most articles refer to the band collectively, not the Petitioner individually. Translations were incomplete, only one article mentioned the Petitioner by name (and only in a list of band members), and the Petitioner did not explain how website rankings established qualifying media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-30_01_B2203; source_row=26772 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c