Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12271–12280
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-28_03_B2203; source_row=26765 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration for services
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's assertion was vague, unsupported, and untimely, having never been put before the Director. An appeal is not the proper vehicle for raising new claims the Director had no opportunity to consider.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's assertion was vague, unsupported, and untimely, having never been put before the Director. An appeal is not the proper vehicle for raising new claims the Director had no opportunity to consider.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-28_03_B2203; source_row=26764 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
While one fitness industry expert attested to the originality of the Petitioner's approach, the letters did not provide specific information about the degree to which her work has impacted the field. General praise did not establish a demonstrable impact on fitness training beyond one film production.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
While one fitness industry expert attested to the originality of the Petitioner's approach, the letters did not provide specific information about the degree to which her work has impacted the field. General praise did not establish a demonstrable impact on fitness training beyond one film production.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-28_03_B2203; source_row=26761 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded that given the Beneficiary's track record of successful research and the significance of his work advancing U.S. agricultural interests, his contributions on balance would benefit the United States even assuming qualified U.S. workers are available.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that given the Beneficiary's track record of successful research and the significance of his work advancing U.S. agricultural interests, his contributions on balance would benefit the United States even assuming qualified U.S. workers are available.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-28_02_B5203; source_row=26756 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the Beneficiary's education, experience, expertise, publications, role in funded research projects, and sustained government and corporate funding position him well to continue his soil science research endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Beneficiary's education, experience, expertise, publications, role in funded research projects, and sustained government and corporate funding position him well to continue his soil science research endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-28_02_B5203; source_row=26755 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Director misstated the proposed endeavor by focusing on teaching duties and ignored evidence that the Beneficiary's soil science research has broader implications, dissemination, and prospective impact on the field.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director misstated the proposed endeavor by focusing on teaching duties and ignored evidence that the Beneficiary's soil science research has broader implications, dissemination, and prospective impact on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-28_02_B5203; source_row=26754 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO did not reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first and second prongs, making the third prong unnecessary to the decision.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first and second prongs, making the third prong unnecessary to the decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-28_01_B5203; source_row=26746 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in dicta that the record did not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in dicta that the record did not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-28_04_B2203; source_row=26769 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
No credential evaluation was provided to confirm equivalency of the foreign bachelor's degree to a U.S. baccalaureate, and even with such equivalency the petition was filed less than five years after the March 2014 degree was conferred, so the five-year progressive experience requirement could not be met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
No credential evaluation was provided to confirm equivalency of the foreign bachelor's degree to a U.S. baccalaureate, and even with such equivalency the petition was filed less than five years after the March 2014 degree was conferred, so the five-year progressive experience requirement could not be met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-22_05_B5203; source_row=26734 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c