Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12311–12320
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis purposeless.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis purposeless.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-01_01_B5203; source_row=26694 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO reversed the Director's conclusion on appeal and determined that the Petitioner did in fact meet the criterion for display at artistic exhibitions or showcases. This was not contested on motion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO reversed the Director's conclusion on appeal and determined that the Petitioner did in fact meet the criterion for display at artistic exhibitions or showcases. This was not contested on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-12-01_02_B2203; source_row=26697 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
One-Time Major Internationally Recognized Award
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that the award was given to the team as a whole rather than to the Petitioner individually, and further found that even if it had been granted to him, the Petitioner failed to establish that it is a major, internationally recognized award of the caliber contemplated by the statute.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the award was given to the team as a whole rather than to the Petitioner individually, and further found that even if it had been granted to him, the Petitioner failed to establish that it is a major, internationally recognized award of the caliber contemplated by the statute.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_05_B2203; source_row=26682 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that contradictory evidence—including web articles identifying a different individual as the MCHEC leader and not mentioning the Petitioner's role—undermined her claim to a leading role with the MCHEC.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that contradictory evidence—including web articles identifying a different individual as the MCHEC leader and not mentioning the Petitioner's role—undermined her claim to a leading role with the MCHEC. As for the School, the registration certificate listed only another person as legal representative, a brochure identified the Petitioner as faculty rather than principal, and a newspaper article was inconsistent with her claimed role since 2007. The School's distinguished reputation was also not established due to discrepancies in the award certificates and insufficient information about the awards.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_03_B2203; source_row=26674 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical2 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner's research showed novelty and was published in reputable journals, the citations were low, expert letters were largely conclusory and hyperbolic, and the evidence did not demonstrate that her contributions had been widely implemented, substantially influenced the field, or otherwise risen to the level of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's research showed novelty and was published in reputable journals, the citations were low, expert letters were largely conclusory and hyperbolic, and the evidence did not demonstrate that her contributions had been widely implemented, substantially influenced the field, or otherwise risen to the level of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_04_B2203; source_row=26678 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that this criterion was met. The peer review invitation emails did not demonstrate actual completion of reviews, and teaching/evaluating medical students does not constitute judging the work of others in the petitioner's field or an allied field.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that this criterion was met. The peer review invitation emails did not demonstrate actual completion of reviews, and teaching/evaluating medical students does not constitute judging the work of others in the petitioner's field or an allied field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_04_B2203; source_row=26677 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
PhysicsPostdoctoral Researcher
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
Both the Director and AAO agreed this criterion was satisfied. AAO noted that the Director failed to weigh related evidence in the final merits discussion, but did not disturb the Step 1 finding.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed this criterion was satisfied. AAO noted that the Director failed to weigh related evidence in the final merits discussion, but did not disturb the Step 1 finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_01_B2203; source_row=26659 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Both the Director and AAO agreed this criterion was satisfied. AAO noted the Director improperly excluded non-first-author publications and compared citation record only to senior referee professors, but did not disturb the Step 1 finding.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed this criterion was satisfied. AAO noted the Director improperly excluded non-first-author publications and compared citation record only to senior referee professors, but did not disturb the Step 1 finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_01_B2203; source_row=26660 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c