Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12321–12330
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
PhysicsPostdoctoral Researcher
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to take a position on the Petitioner's ultimate eligibility, finding the Director's final merits determination procedurally deficient for disregarding evidence, excluding non-first-author publications without basis, and comparing citation record only to senior professor referees. The matter was remanded for a proper analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to take a position on the Petitioner's ultimate eligibility, finding the Director's final merits determination procedurally deficient for disregarding evidence, excluding non-first-author publications without basis, and comparing citation record only to senior professor referees. The matter was remanded for a proper analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_01_B2203; source_row=26661 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Both the Director and AAO agreed this criterion was satisfied. AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner met the judging criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed this criterion was satisfied. AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner met the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_01_B2203; source_row=26658 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalResearcher
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the reference letters and citation history did not establish that the Petitioner's research had been widely accepted, implemented, or had significantly influenced the field. AAO criticized the Director's reliance on a comparison of overall citation counts as inappropriate at the criterion stage, but reached the same conclusion.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the reference letters and citation history did not establish that the Petitioner's research had been widely accepted, implemented, or had significantly influenced the field. AAO criticized the Director's reliance on a comparison of overall citation counts as inappropriate at the criterion stage, but reached the same conclusion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_06_B2203; source_row=26688 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the reference letters did not establish that the Petitioner's research roles were leading based on placement in organizational hierarchies or critical to the success/standing of the institutions. New evidence on appeal was not considered under Soriano/Obaigbena, and even if considered, did not change the result.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the reference letters did not establish that the Petitioner's research roles were leading based on placement in organizational hierarchies or critical to the success/standing of the institutions. New evidence on appeal was not considered under Soriano/Obaigbena, and even if considered, did not change the result.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_06_B2203; source_row=26690 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that authorship of scholarly articles in journals such as Hypertension, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, and Journal of Cardiology satisfied this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that authorship of scholarly articles in journals such as Hypertension, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, and Journal of Cardiology satisfied this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_06_B2203; source_row=26689 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalResearcher
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidence requirements, but indicated that an aggregate review would not support eligibility.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidence requirements, but indicated that an aggregate review would not support eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_06_B2203; source_row=26691 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's placings in national taekwondo and muay thai championships met the plain language of this criterion as they were demonstrated to be top events in the field at the national level, disagreeing with the Director.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's placings in national taekwondo and muay thai championships met the plain language of this criterion as they were demonstrated to be top events in the field at the national level, disagreeing with the Director.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_05_B2203; source_row=26683 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that despite discrepancies in the hapkido judging evidence, the Petitioner's photographs corroborating muay thai judging at a 2016 event, combined with evidence of the substantive duties involved, were sufficient to meet this criterion, disagreeing with the Director.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that despite discrepancies in the hapkido judging evidence, the Petitioner's photographs corroborating muay thai judging at a 2016 event, combined with evidence of the substantive duties involved, were sufficient to meet this criterion, disagreeing with the Director.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_05_B2203; source_row=26685 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that a 1997 article focused on the Petitioner and his career published in a newspaper with a circulation of 55,000—one of a small number of major newspapers—satisfied the criterion, disagreeing with the Director.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that a 1997 article focused on the Petitioner and his career published in a newspaper with a circulation of 55,000—one of a small number of major newspapers—satisfied the criterion, disagreeing with the Director.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_05_B2203; source_row=26684 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c