Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12331–12340
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final Merits Determination – Sustained National or International Acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's achievements were primarily at the national level, his international athletic participation was extremely limited after 1997, his coaching accomplishments were undermined by numerous unresolved inconsistencies, and the reference letters were conclusory and failed to provide specific details about his outstanding achievements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's achievements were primarily at the national level, his international athletic participation was extremely limited after 1997, his coaching accomplishments were undermined by numerous unresolved inconsistencies, and the reference letters were conclusory and failed to provide specific details about his outstanding achievements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_05_B2203; source_row=26686 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO did not reach final merits because the Petitioner failed the step-1 threshold, but noted in the aggregate the record does not show the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach final merits because the Petitioner failed the step-1 threshold, but noted in the aggregate the record does not show the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_03_B2203; source_row=26675 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIFounder
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Petitioner's patents, expert letters from a NASA scientist, robotics marketing lead, Italian Trade Agency head, and a VP of Engineering at the acquiring company, along with interest from Apple and Amazon, collectively established that his AI technology had major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's patents, expert letters from a NASA scientist, robotics marketing lead, Italian Trade Agency head, and a VP of Engineering at the acquiring company, along with interest from Apple and Amazon, collectively established that his AI technology had major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_02_B2203; source_row=26664 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIFounder
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained acclaim and top of field
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the totality of evidence sufficient to establish sustained national acclaim and placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field of endeavor.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the totality of evidence sufficient to establish sustained national acclaim and placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field of endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_02_B2203; source_row=26667 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications, including journals such as Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy, Clinical Case Reports, and Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications, including journals such as Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy, Clinical Case Reports, and Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_04_B2203; source_row=26679 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical2 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required level of acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required level of acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-30_04_B2203; source_row=26681 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c