Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
On the prior appeal, the AAO determined the Petitioner met the leading or critical role criterion, disagreeing with the Director on this point, though the overall petition was still denied for failing to meet three criteria.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
On the prior appeal, the AAO determined the Petitioner met the leading or critical role criterion, disagreeing with the Director on this point, though the overall petition was still denied for failing to meet three criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-25_02_B2203; source_row=26600 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary's ability to perform the job duties / bona fides of the offered position
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO flagged that the fraud conviction may render the Beneficiary ineligible to register as an investment adviser, that the labor certification fails to list registration eligibility as a minimum requirement, and that multiple inconsistencies in the Petitioner's address and operations remain unresolved.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO flagged that the fraud conviction may render the Beneficiary ineligible to register as an investment adviser, that the labor certification fails to list registration eligibility as a minimum requirement, and that multiple inconsistencies in the Petitioner's address and operations remain unresolved.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-25_03_B5203; source_row=26606 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner's article was not an objective or independent evaluation but was essentially an advertisement for a product offered by his employer, containing only positive opinions and a coupon code, and therefore did not constitute judging the work of others.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's article was not an objective or independent evaluation but was essentially an advertisement for a product offered by his employer, containing only positive opinions and a coupon code, and therefore did not constitute judging the work of others.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_07_B2203; source_row=26557 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The press releases were issued by a marketing service and disclaimed by the outlets that published them, functioning more as advertising than journalism. Foreign-language articles lacked required author credits. Other outlets such as the student publication and poker websites did not qualify as professional or major media given their limited readership or web traffic.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The press releases were issued by a marketing service and disclaimed by the outlets that published them, functioning more as advertising than journalism. Foreign-language articles lacked required author credits. Other outlets such as the student publication and poker websites did not qualify as professional or major media given their limited readership or web traffic.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_07_B2203; source_row=26556 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Support letters offered only general and hyperbolic praise without documenting how the Petitioner's contributions were of major significance throughout the field. The WPN contribution was publicized only through the Petitioner's own press releases. The YouTube interview about gender outreach had only 116 and 71 views. The book was unpublished at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Support letters offered only general and hyperbolic praise without documenting how the Petitioner's contributions were of major significance throughout the field. The WPN contribution was publicized only through the Petitioner's own press releases. The YouTube interview about gender outreach had only 116 and 71 views. The book was unpublished at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_07_B2203; source_row=26558 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c