Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12431–12440
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, though it noted in advisory fashion that the record would not support the required showing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, though it noted in advisory fashion that the record would not support the required showing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_02_B2203; source_row=26531 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record established the Petitioner rose to Finance Director at a multinational corporation with a distinguished reputation, playing a critical role in financial controls, systems design, and strategic advisory for Latin American affiliates.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record established the Petitioner rose to Finance Director at a multinational corporation with a distinguished reputation, playing a critical role in financial controls, systems design, and strategic advisory for Latin American affiliates.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_02_B2203; source_row=26529 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's own opinion of his work's importance is not acclaim, and the record shows minimal activity over more than a decade with no evidence of how others in the field have used or responded to his work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's own opinion of his work's importance is not acclaim, and the record shows minimal activity over more than a decade with no evidence of how others in the field have used or responded to his work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_01_B2203; source_row=26522 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherEngineerPhD73 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Director did not give sufficient weight to evidence of heavy citation of the Petitioner's articles and attention from significant science and technology media outlets, and concluded criterion (v) was met.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Director did not give sufficient weight to evidence of heavy citation of the Petitioner's articles and attention from significant science and technology media outlets, and concluded criterion (v) was met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_09_B2203; source_row=26575 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherEngineerPhD73 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO determined the Petitioner had not shown sustained individual acclaim. His recognition was largely collective from his doctoral lab, his post-graduate work did not attract comparable attention, the letters of support were speculative about potential impact, and overall the record did not place the Petitioner at the very top of his field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO determined the Petitioner had not shown sustained individual acclaim. His recognition was largely collective from his doctoral lab, his post-graduate work did not attract comparable attention, the letters of support were speculative about potential impact, and overall the record did not place the Petitioner at the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_09_B2203; source_row=26577 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not assert that he believed the falsified materials to be authentic, offered no explanation when given the opportunity to rebut the findings, and signed Form I-140 under penalty of perjury certifying the evidence as true and correct.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not assert that he believed the falsified materials to be authentic, offered no explanation when given the opportunity to rebut the findings, and signed Form I-140 under penalty of perjury certifying the evidence as true and correct.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_03_B2203; source_row=26533 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner submitted falsified images of prize materials, magazine covers, and articles to support his petition, constituting a false representation to a government official.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted falsified images of prize materials, magazine covers, and articles to support his petition, constituting a false representation to a government official.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_03_B2203; source_row=26532 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the published materials, prominent murals, lucrative commercial work with clients who chose him based on existing reputation, and a solo exhibition of creative process work collectively established the Petitioner's prominence and sustained national acclaim, satisfying the final merits standard by a preponderance of the evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the published materials, prominent murals, lucrative commercial work with clients who chose him based on existing reputation, and a solo exhibition of creative process work collectively established the Petitioner's prominence and sustained national acclaim, satisfying the final merits standard by a preponderance of the evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_04_B2203; source_row=26541 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
continued work in field and substantial prospective benefit to the United States
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO withdrew the Director's conclusions because the Petitioner had submitted concrete letters from two prospective clients, and the Director neither explained the letters' deficiencies nor cited evidence undermining their credibility.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's conclusions because the Petitioner had submitted concrete letters from two prospective clients, and the Director neither explained the letters' deficiencies nor cited evidence undermining their credibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_04_B2203; source_row=26542 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c