Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 12471–12480

NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that while the record supports substantial merit (given evidence on fall costs and healthcare demand), the Petitioner did not demonstrate that her proposed mobile physical therapy business would have prospective impact rising to national importance.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the record supports substantial merit (given evidence on fall costs and healthcare demand), the Petitioner did not demonstrate that her proposed mobile physical therapy business would have prospective impact rising to national importance. Her projected staffing of five employees and regional sales projections do not show substantial positive economic effects nationally, and the nationwide PT shortage alone does not render an individual business operator's work nationally important.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-16_08_B5203; source_row=26494
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO reaffirmed its prior determination that the Petitioner was not well positioned to advance his endeavor. The newly submitted employment verification, coworker letters, training certificates, and topical articles did not establish that the Petitioner's work has generated influence, citations by others, or a record of success in the field.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO reaffirmed its prior determination that the Petitioner was not well positioned to advance his endeavor. The newly submitted employment verification, coworker letters, training certificates, and topical articles did not establish that the Petitioner's work has generated influence, citations by others, or a record of success in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-16_04_B5203; source_row=26483
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

evidence of advanced degree or equivalent

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees that no documentation of the Beneficiary's education was submitted at any stage, so the advanced-degree-professional requirement is not established.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees that no documentation of the Beneficiary's education was submitted at any stage, so the advanced-degree-professional requirement is not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-16_03_B5203; source_row=26481
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

Judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner complied with the judging criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner complied with the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-16_01_B2203; source_row=26477
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that although the award does not qualify as a one-time major internationally recognized award, it does satisfy the lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that although the award does not qualify as a one-time major internationally recognized award, it does satisfy the lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-16_01_B2203; source_row=26475
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

Final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold evidence requirements, but noted in dicta that the record as a whole would not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold evidence requirements, but noted in dicta that the record as a whole would not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-16_01_B2203; source_row=26478
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO declined to analyze the second prong because the first prong was not satisfied, rendering further analysis unnecessary.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to analyze the second prong because the first prong was not satisfied, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-16_06_B5203; source_row=26489
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification

What the decision said

AAO declined to analyze the third prong because the first prong was not satisfied, rendering further analysis unnecessary.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to analyze the third prong because the first prong was not satisfied, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-16_06_B5203; source_row=26490
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO explicitly declined to reach prong two because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, citing that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong two because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, citing that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-16_05_B5203; source_row=26486
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO explicitly declined to reach prong three because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, citing that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong three because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, citing that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-16_05_B5203; source_row=26487
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment