Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
Even assuming the hospitality area of a major international sporting event qualifies as an artistic exhibition or showcase, the artistic concept for the décor was developed by the contracted vendor, not by the Petitioner, so the work displayed was not her own.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Even assuming the hospitality area of a major international sporting event qualifies as an artistic exhibition or showcase, the artistic concept for the décor was developed by the contracted vendor, not by the Petitioner, so the work displayed was not her own.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-15_04_B2203; source_row=26468 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other15 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in the alternative that the record does not support a finding of the requisite acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in the alternative that the record does not support a finding of the requisite acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-15_03_B2203; source_row=26464 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other15 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
The Petitioner submitted evidence establishing that the Beneficiary served in critical roles within its corporate group and with another distinguished organization, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted evidence establishing that the Beneficiary served in critical roles within its corporate group and with another distinguished organization, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-15_03_B2203; source_row=26463 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-one threshold, but noted in dicta that the record would not support the required finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-one threshold, but noted in dicta that the record would not support the required finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-15_04_B2203; source_row=26473 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the Petitioner created original work product as part of her position-related responsibilities, the evidence does not show how the procedures and guidelines were novel compared to previous editions, and availability in FIFA/IOC repositories alone is insufficient without evidence of widespread commentary or influence. The letters from colleagues do not address the impact of her written work on the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner created original work product as part of her position-related responsibilities, the evidence does not show how the procedures and guidelines were novel compared to previous editions, and availability in FIFA/IOC repositories alone is insufficient without evidence of widespread commentary or influence. The letters from colleagues do not address the impact of her written work on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-15_04_B2203; source_row=26467 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
The evidence supports the Director's conclusion and sufficiently documents the Petitioner's critical roles as a management employee of the local organizing committees for the 2016 Summer Olympic Games and the 2014 FIFA World Cup held in Brazil.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence supports the Director's conclusion and sufficiently documents the Petitioner's critical roles as a management employee of the local organizing committees for the 2016 Summer Olympic Games and the 2014 FIFA World Cup held in Brazil.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-15_04_B2203; source_row=26469 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherMaster’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's final merits analysis so deficient in its treatment of evidence that meaningful appellate review was impossible; it withdrew the decision and remanded for a new determination weighing the totality of the record.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's final merits analysis so deficient in its treatment of evidence that meaningful appellate review was impossible; it withdrew the decision and remanded for a new determination weighing the totality of the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-15_02_B2203; source_row=26457 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c