Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
Taken as a whole, the documentation shows the Petitioner won national and international competitions under the authority of a major international governing body, meeting the lesser standards of this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Taken as a whole, the documentation shows the Petitioner won national and international competitions under the authority of a major international governing body, meeting the lesser standards of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-05_08_B2203; source_row=26420 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
Leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
What the decision said
AAO declined to consider this criterion because it was first raised on appeal, and the director could not have erred with respect to it. Moreover, even if met, it could not change the outcome since the Petitioner only met one criterion total.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to consider this criterion because it was first raised on appeal, and the director could not have erred with respect to it. Moreover, even if met, it could not change the outcome since the Petitioner only met one criterion total.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-05_08_B2203; source_row=26424 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The new certificates establishing the Petitioner's participation as an official at a karate tournament, combined with a letter confirming he was invited as a judge to a Pan American Tournament for 23 years and a rulebook explaining the judging role, sufficiently establishes this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The new certificates establishing the Petitioner's participation as an official at a karate tournament, combined with a letter confirming he was invited as a judge to a Pan American Tournament for 23 years and a rulebook explaining the judging role, sufficiently establishes this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-05_05_B2203; source_row=26408 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner established peer review activity for journals such as Radiation Research, Food, and Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals, and editorial roles for two additional journals.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner established peer review activity for journals such as Radiation Research, Food, and Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals, and editorial roles for two additional journals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-05_01_B2203; source_row=26389 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences40 papers3 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence requirement, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record did not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence requirement, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record did not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-05_01_B2203; source_row=26393 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner submitted evidence of coauthoring more than 40 articles published in scientific journals, which the AAO found sufficient to satisfy this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted evidence of coauthoring more than 40 articles published in scientific journals, which the AAO found sufficient to satisfy this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-05_01_B2203; source_row=26391 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
labor certification supports advanced degree professional classification
Why AAO was not persuaded
Applying the plain language of the labor certification, AAO concluded the added 'in lieu of' phrase expanded acceptable qualifications beyond those spelled out in section H, so the offered position does not require an advanced degree as defined by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Applying the plain language of the labor certification, AAO concluded the added 'in lieu of' phrase expanded acceptable qualifications beyond those spelled out in section H, so the offered position does not require an advanced degree as defined by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-06_01_B5203; source_row=26435 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
labor certification requires advanced degree professional
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the conflict between Part H.4 (master's degree) and Part H.14 (bachelor's degree accepted) unresolved because the petitioner did not produce the actual recruitment advertisements confirming that applicants were told a master's degree was required. The Director's review of the labor certification's minimum requirements is squarely within USCIS's scope of authority.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the conflict between Part H.4 (master's degree) and Part H.14 (bachelor's degree accepted) unresolved because the petitioner did not produce the actual recruitment advertisements confirming that applicants were told a master's degree was required. The Director's review of the labor certification's minimum requirements is squarely within USCIS's scope of authority.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-01_03_B5203; source_row=26381 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c