Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Screenshots from a French website lacked certified English translations and thus had no probative value. A 2001 local newspaper article showed the Beneficiary received an award in an 'Other Individual' sports category, but the Petitioner did not demonstrate national or international significance — the article indicated a locally recognized award rather than a nationally or internationally recognized award for excellence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Screenshots from a French website lacked certified English translations and thus had no probative value. A 2001 local newspaper article showed the Beneficiary received an award in an 'Other Individual' sports category, but the Petitioner did not demonstrate national or international significance — the article indicated a locally recognized award rather than a nationally or internationally recognized award for excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_04_B2203; source_row=26340 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The L'Echo Republican article was not about the Beneficiary, and lacked an author. Photographs from Patinage Magazine did not constitute published material about the Beneficiary and lacked title and author.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The L'Echo Republican article was not about the Beneficiary, and lacked an author. Photographs from Patinage Magazine did not constitute published material about the Beneficiary and lacked title and author. Of seven Les Informations Dieppoises articles, only one met the title/date/author requirement, but the Petitioner failed to establish that publication qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium — indeed, it is described as a regional newspaper.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_04_B2203; source_row=26342 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner first raised this criterion on appeal. The Petitioner provided an ISI judging accreditation certificate, but did not establish that the Beneficiary actually participated as a judge at figure skating events or competitions, as opposed to merely holding a qualification to judge.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner first raised this criterion on appeal. The Petitioner provided an ISI judging accreditation certificate, but did not establish that the Beneficiary actually participated as a judge at figure skating events or competitions, as opposed to merely holding a qualification to judge.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_04_B2203; source_row=26343 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's academic awards, paper reviews, publications, low citation counts, and recommendation letters did not establish that his work had major significance in the field. Citations were minimal and letters were conclusory, failing to demonstrate widespread impact or influence beyond individual institutions and employers.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's academic awards, paper reviews, publications, low citation counts, and recommendation letters did not establish that his work had major significance in the field. Citations were minimal and letters were conclusory, failing to demonstrate widespread impact or influence beyond individual institutions and employers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_09_B2203; source_row=26362 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner submitted California wage data for computer programmers while his employment was in New York, without explaining the geographical discrepancy. He also compared his salary as a principal platform engineer against lower-level computer programmer wages rather than against others in his specific role.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted California wage data for computer programmers while his employment was in New York, without explaining the geographical discrepancy. He also compared his salary as a principal platform engineer against lower-level computer programmer wages rather than against others in his specific role.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_09_B2203; source_row=26364 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the reference letters did not show the Petitioner's findings affected therapies or generated positive discourse; citation counts were low and lacked comparative context; the internal award's significance in the broader field was not established; peer review activity did not demonstrate a record of success; and database inclusion and news releases did not show interest in her research.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the reference letters did not show the Petitioner's findings affected therapies or generated positive discourse; citation counts were low and lacked comparative context; the internal award's significance in the broader field was not established; peer review activity did not demonstrate a record of success; and database inclusion and news releases did not show interest in her research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_03_B5203; source_row=26337 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The letters discussed the Petitioner's role on a television show rather than a leading/critical role for an organization or establishment. The petitioner did not show how a TV show qualifies as an organization, did not show leadership at the production companies or network, and the talent agency letter merely repeated regulatory language without specific detail and did not establish the agency's distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters discussed the Petitioner's role on a television show rather than a leading/critical role for an organization or establishment. The petitioner did not show how a TV show qualifies as an organization, did not show leadership at the production companies or network, and the talent agency letter merely repeated regulatory language without specific detail and did not establish the agency's distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_01_B2203; source_row=26320 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO did not formally reach the final merits determination because the petitioner failed at step 1, but reviewed the record in the aggregate and concluded it did not support sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not formally reach the final merits determination because the petitioner failed at step 1, but reviewed the record in the aggregate and concluded it did not support sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_01_B2203; source_row=26321 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The 'Original Song' award was not in the petitioner's field of endeavor (acting). The 'Best Performance' award was a popular-vote award with insufficient evidence of national/international recognition. The 'Actor of the Year' plaque did not match the figurine described in the article and the article did not establish the award's significance beyond the festival.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 'Original Song' award was not in the petitioner's field of endeavor (acting). The 'Best Performance' award was a popular-vote award with insufficient evidence of national/international recognition. The 'Actor of the Year' plaque did not match the figurine described in the article and the article did not establish the award's significance beyond the festival.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_01_B2203; source_row=26318 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the articles did not constitute published material about the Petitioner because they merely mentioned his name once in passing; additionally, the Petitioner failed to establish that Rural Life qualifies as a professional or major trade publication.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the articles did not constitute published material about the Petitioner because they merely mentioned his name once in passing; additionally, the Petitioner failed to establish that Rural Life qualifies as a professional or major trade publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_05_B2203; source_row=26348 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c