Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found that the Petitioner did not demonstrate that membership in either academy is judged by recognized national or international experts, as documentation did not show the composition of the selection bodies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner did not demonstrate that membership in either academy is judged by recognized national or international experts, as documentation did not show the composition of the selection bodies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_05_B2203; source_row=26347 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, noting the documentation did not show the status, standing, or reputation of the awards, nor any widespread reporting or coverage from field publications.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, noting the documentation did not show the status, standing, or reputation of the awards, nor any widespread reporting or coverage from field publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_05_B2203; source_row=26346 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the domus design articles were about apartments and design rather than about the Petitioner, and that the Petitioner did not establish that domus design or Photographer qualify as professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the domus design articles were about apartments and design rather than about the Petitioner, and that the Petitioner did not establish that domus design or Photographer qualify as professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_08_B2203; source_row=26358 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found inconsistencies in Petitioner's claims about her role, that her remuneration was as an interior designer rather than a salary, and that the new invoice was dated after the filing date and thus could not establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found inconsistencies in Petitioner's claims about her role, that her remuneration was as an interior designer rather than a salary, and that the new invoice was dated after the filing date and thus could not establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_08_B2203; source_row=26359 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The plaque was dated 2019, after the petition filing date of December 29, 2017, so it cannot establish eligibility at time of filing. Moreover, the plaque was issued by a local or regional source signed by a mayor and does not represent a nationally or internationally recognized award for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The plaque was dated 2019, after the petition filing date of December 29, 2017, so it cannot establish eligibility at time of filing. Moreover, the plaque was issued by a local or regional source signed by a mayor and does not represent a nationally or internationally recognized award for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_07_B2203; source_row=26353 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
member of the professions holding an advanced degree
What the decision said
AAO notes the Director entirely omitted analysis of the advanced degree requirement and remands for that determination to be made in the first instance.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO notes the Director entirely omitted analysis of the advanced degree requirement and remands for that determination to be made in the first instance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_01_B5203; source_row=26322 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO notes the Director failed to make any determination on prong one and remands for proper analysis, including whether the Petitioner's proposed endeavor's prospective impact rises to national importance and extends beyond his company and clients.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO notes the Director failed to make any determination on prong one and remands for proper analysis, including whether the Petitioner's proposed endeavor's prospective impact rises to national importance and extends beyond his company and clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_01_B5203; source_row=26323 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's prong three analysis to be in error because it failed to evaluate the evidence against the identified factors and instead improperly derived its conclusion from the flawed prong two determination.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's prong three analysis to be in error because it failed to evaluate the evidence against the identified factors and instead improperly derived its conclusion from the flawed prong two determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_01_B5203; source_row=26325 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis of prong two deficient because it did not properly analyze the content of recommendation letters or sufficiently discuss the evidence, and remands for proper evaluation.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis of prong two deficient because it did not properly analyze the content of recommendation letters or sufficiently discuss the evidence, and remands for proper evaluation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_01_B5203; source_row=26324 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta the record does not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta the record does not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-24_03_B2203; source_row=26335 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c