Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12621–12630
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Beneficiary's duties as senior creative designer, involving team leadership, global campaign development, brand strategy, and creative direction, go well beyond what the DOL 'Graphic Designer' occupation describes. Therefore, wage data for graphic designers did not permit a meaningful comparison of her salary relative to others performing comparable work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary's duties as senior creative designer, involving team leadership, global campaign development, brand strategy, and creative direction, go well beyond what the DOL 'Graphic Designer' occupation describes. Therefore, wage data for graphic designers did not permit a meaningful comparison of her salary relative to others performing comparable work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-23_03_B2203; source_row=26316 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Letters from colleagues and former employers praised the Beneficiary's talents but did not identify specific original contributions of major significance or explain how her work impacted the field. The most specific letter identifying a photography style did not establish that this creative choice rises to major significance, and other letters from the Petitioner did not corroborate this claim.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Letters from colleagues and former employers praised the Beneficiary's talents but did not identify specific original contributions of major significance or explain how her work impacted the field. The most specific letter identifying a photography style did not establish that this creative choice rises to major significance, and other letters from the Petitioner did not corroborate this claim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-23_03_B2203; source_row=26313 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO previously found, and reaffirmed on motion, that the expert letters were based on the Petitioner's own affidavit rather than independent professional knowledge, that testimonial evidence of committee membership was unsupported by primary sources, that a 2007 award and student awards did not evidence sustained acclaim, and that the letters did not confirm industry-wide acceptance of the Petitioner's methodology.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO previously found, and reaffirmed on motion, that the expert letters were based on the Petitioner's own affidavit rather than independent professional knowledge, that testimonial evidence of committee membership was unsupported by primary sources, that a 2007 award and student awards did not evidence sustained acclaim, and that the letters did not confirm industry-wide acceptance of the Petitioner's methodology. The Petitioner on motion did not identify any legal or policy error in this analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=26310 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
While AAO agreed that former employer letters were insufficiently detailed, it found the criterion met based on the Beneficiary's current role as senior creative designer for the petitioning company.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While AAO agreed that former employer letters were insufficiently detailed, it found the criterion met based on the Beneficiary's current role as senior creative designer for the petitioning company. Two detailed letters from the company, including one from the Global Creative Director, provided comprehensive descriptions of her critical role in the re-branding strategy, specific project examples, and financial information demonstrating the brand's importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-23_03_B2203; source_row=26315 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the record lacked required regulatory evidence of ability to pay from the priority date, and that the Petitioner must also account for combined proffered wages of other pending/approved I-140 petitions. The issue was remanded to the Director.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record lacked required regulatory evidence of ability to pay from the priority date, and that the Petitioner must also account for combined proffered wages of other pending/approved I-140 petitions. The issue was remanded to the Director.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-22_01_B5203; source_row=26309 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held that because every labor certification petitioner has already identified a foreign national before the required recruitment, pre-advertisement interviews are consistent with DOL regulations and do not indicate the position was not open to U.S. workers. The Director's basis for revocation was legally erroneous.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that because every labor certification petitioner has already identified a foreign national before the required recruitment, pre-advertisement interviews are consistent with DOL regulations and do not indicate the position was not open to U.S. workers. The Director's basis for revocation was legally erroneous.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-22_01_B5203; source_row=26308 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding. The Cultural Monthly article lacked evidence establishing it is a professional, major trade publication, or major medium. The Times of Malta article was about an exhibition, not about the Petitioner, and lacked an identified author.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding. The Cultural Monthly article lacked evidence establishing it is a professional, major trade publication, or major medium. The Times of Malta article was about an exhibition, not about the Petitioner, and lacked an identified author. The Beijing Youth Weekly article was about the Petitioner's book, not about the Petitioner himself, also lacked an author, and lacked comparative circulation evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-08_01_B2203; source_row=26304 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that the letters lacked sufficiently detailed information and the record lacked adequate corroborating documentation. The letters did not explain the unusual influence or high impact of the Petitioner's work on the overall field, and impact described was prospective rather than established. Participation at a conference alone does not demonstrate a contribution of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the letters lacked sufficiently detailed information and the record lacked adequate corroborating documentation. The letters did not explain the unusual influence or high impact of the Petitioner's work on the overall field, and impact described was prospective rather than established. Participation at a conference alone does not demonstrate a contribution of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-09-08_01_B2203; source_row=26305 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c