Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12651–12660
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
What the decision said
Director stated in the RFE that this criterion was met but failed to count it or explain a contrary conclusion in the final decision. AAO remands for the Director to determine whether this criterion is satisfied.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Director stated in the RFE that this criterion was met but failed to count it or explain a contrary conclusion in the final decision. AAO remands for the Director to determine whether this criterion is satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-27_02_B2203; source_row=26279 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the record supports that financial management work has substantial merit, the Petitioner did not show that her specific proposed endeavor would have prospective impact beyond her employer and clientele to rise to the level of national importance, nor did she demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or create substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
While the record supports that financial management work has substantial merit, the Petitioner did not show that her specific proposed endeavor would have prospective impact beyond her employer and clientele to rise to the level of national importance, nor did she demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or create substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-26_02_B5203; source_row=26268 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the record supported a finding of substantial merit for the Petitioner's work as an automotive business entrepreneur, but that the prospective impact of his proposed endeavor did not rise to the level of national importance. The Petitioner failed to show his business would extend beyond his company and customers to impact the broader U.S.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the record supported a finding of substantial merit for the Petitioner's work as an automotive business entrepreneur, but that the prospective impact of his proposed endeavor did not rise to the level of national importance. The Petitioner failed to show his business would extend beyond his company and customers to impact the broader U.S. economy or automotive industry, and did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or offer substantial positive economic effects nationally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-26_03_B5203; source_row=26271 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO disagreed with the Director. The initial photocopied pages consist mostly of large photographs and general statements, not scholarly writing. The complete book post-dates the filing date, mixes scholarly and popular writing styles, has internal inconsistencies suggesting it is a compilation without editorial review, and was privately printed without establishing actual publication.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The AAO disagreed with the Director. The initial photocopied pages consist mostly of large photographs and general statements, not scholarly writing. The complete book post-dates the filing date, mixes scholarly and popular writing styles, has internal inconsistencies suggesting it is a compilation without editorial review, and was privately printed without establishing actual publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-26_02_B2203; source_row=26265 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed with the Director's overall final merits conclusion. The record contains credibility concerns that undermine the evidence presented, and the Petitioner failed to address specific deficiencies identified by the Director on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director's overall final merits conclusion. The record contains credibility concerns that undermine the evidence presented, and the Petitioner failed to address specific deficiencies identified by the Director on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-26_02_B2203; source_row=26267 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not establish that either prize is nationally or internationally recognized. The University prize appears to be an academic award limited to students at that institution.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not establish that either prize is nationally or internationally recognized. The University prize appears to be an academic award limited to students at that institution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-26_02_B2203; source_row=26261 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters are neither persuasive nor credible: they fail to explain how preserving or reviving a traditional art constitutes an original contribution, two letters contain identical language including first-person references that should be unique to each author, and they do not specifically identify any contribution of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The letters are neither persuasive nor credible: they fail to explain how preserving or reviving a traditional art constitutes an original contribution, two letters contain identical language including first-person references that should be unique to each author, and they do not specifically identify any contribution of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-26_02_B2203; source_row=26264 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that a letter from the association's CEO was of questionable authenticity due to a passage referencing 'quality software' and 'critical components to our systems,' which has no relevance to jewelry. The Petitioner also failed to submit the association's Charter or governing documents, and a second letter revealing 15,000 members suggests non-selective membership.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that a letter from the association's CEO was of questionable authenticity due to a passage referencing 'quality software' and 'critical components to our systems,' which has no relevance to jewelry. The Petitioner also failed to submit the association's Charter or governing documents, and a second letter revealing 15,000 members suggests non-selective membership.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-26_02_B2203; source_row=26262 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c