Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12681–12690
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The website snapshots showed only biography data such as name, date of birth, and film credits, and did not constitute published material about the Petitioner relating to his work. Additionally, the required title, date, and author were not included, and the attendance statistics did not demonstrate the significance of the sites as professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The website snapshots showed only biography data such as name, date of birth, and film credits, and did not constitute published material about the Petitioner relating to his work. Additionally, the required title, date, and author were not included, and the attendance statistics did not demonstrate the significance of the sites as professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_06_B2203; source_row=26237 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The letter from the general producer made broad statements without providing probative, detailed, and specific information such as actor names, project titles, and dates. Without further information or corroborating documentation, the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the letter was sufficient to establish judging consistent with the regulatory criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The letter from the general producer made broad statements without providing probative, detailed, and specific information such as actor names, project titles, and dates. Without further information or corroborating documentation, the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the letter was sufficient to establish judging consistent with the regulatory criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_06_B2203; source_row=26238 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's publications in high-impact journals, article selections/highlights, citation counts, and recommendation letters did not collectively establish contributions of major significance. The letters were speculative about future impact rather than demonstrating actual major significance, and citation numbers were not shown to be unusually high for the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's publications in high-impact journals, article selections/highlights, citation counts, and recommendation letters did not collectively establish contributions of major significance. The letters were speculative about future impact rather than demonstrating actual major significance, and citation numbers were not shown to be unusually high for the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_04_B2203; source_row=26223 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organization
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's role as a postdoctoral fellow at a hospital/school was not shown to be a leading or critical role. Letters acknowledged his research role but did not demonstrate leadership position or that he was responsible for the organization's outcomes.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's role as a postdoctoral fellow at a hospital/school was not shown to be a leading or critical role. Letters acknowledged his research role but did not demonstrate leadership position or that he was responsible for the organization's outcomes.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_04_B2203; source_row=26224 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner is a chemistry patent agent and must compare his salary to other chemistry patent agents, not to chemists generally. The salary data submitted compared him to chemists rather than to others in his actual occupation, so he failed to demonstrate a high salary relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner is a chemistry patent agent and must compare his salary to other chemistry patent agents, not to chemists generally. The salary data submitted compared him to chemists rather than to others in his actual occupation, so he failed to demonstrate a high salary relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_04_B2203; source_row=26225 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Designer article lacked an identified author; the other articles were about a renovation project rather than about the Petitioner; and the Petitioner failed to establish that any of the outlets qualify as professional or major trade publications or major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Designer article lacked an identified author; the other articles were about a renovation project rather than about the Petitioner; and the Petitioner failed to establish that any of the outlets qualify as professional or major trade publications or major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=26205 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that any of the three awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. The certificates alone were insufficient, and supporting evidence from ASC's own website and a single media article did not establish independent field recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that any of the three awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. The certificates alone were insufficient, and supporting evidence from ASC's own website and a single media article did not establish independent field recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=26204 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The plain language of the criterion requires that published material be about the alien. Articles that discuss projects without mentioning the Beneficiary do not satisfy this requirement, consistent with case law holding that articles about a show are not about the actor.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The plain language of the criterion requires that published material be about the alien. Articles that discuss projects without mentioning the Beneficiary do not satisfy this requirement, consistent with case law holding that articles about a show are not about the actor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_03_B2203; source_row=26215 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The plain language of the criterion requires documentation of the alien's own receipt of prizes or awards, not the employer's. Reference letters and articles showing the Beneficiary was an important team member do not satisfy this requirement, and no regulatory provision allows team contributions to qualify.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The plain language of the criterion requires documentation of the alien's own receipt of prizes or awards, not the employer's. Reference letters and articles showing the Beneficiary was an important team member do not satisfy this requirement, and no regulatory provision allows team contributions to qualify.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_03_B2203; source_row=26214 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
Original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
Reference letters praised the Beneficiary's skill and contributions to specific projects but did not demonstrate wide implementation of his techniques, influence on others in the field, or other evidence that his work has risen to the level of major significance. Letters lacked explanation of how specific work impacted the broader field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Reference letters praised the Beneficiary's skill and contributions to specific projects but did not demonstrate wide implementation of his techniques, influence on others in the field, or other evidence that his work has risen to the level of major significance. Letters lacked explanation of how specific work impacted the broader field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_03_B2203; source_row=26216 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c