Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12691–12700
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
One-time major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Emmy was awarded to the petitioner newspaper, not the Beneficiary personally; the certificate names the Petitioner as the recipient and merely 'honors' the Beneficiary. Moreover, the record does not show the Emmy commands the level of international recognition (global media coverage, large cash prize) required of a one-time major award.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Emmy was awarded to the petitioner newspaper, not the Beneficiary personally; the certificate names the Petitioner as the recipient and merely 'honors' the Beneficiary. Moreover, the record does not show the Emmy commands the level of international recognition (global media coverage, large cash prize) required of a one-time major award.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_03_B2203; source_row=26213 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the certificates were not awarded for excellence in the field (e.g., the Prestige Diploma is given to all competitors), and that even if awarded for excellence, the evidence did not establish that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized outside the issuing organization.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the certificates were not awarded for excellence in the field (e.g., the Prestige Diploma is given to all competitors), and that even if awarded for excellence, the evidence did not establish that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized outside the issuing organization. New evidence on motion to reopen likewise failed to demonstrate national or international recognition of the specific awards received by the Petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_07_B2203; source_row=26242 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO had previously vacated the Director's positive finding and maintained this position on motion. Very brief career summaries within multi-page articles about other topics are insufficient to show that articles are 'about' the Petitioner. New evidence of viewership figures did not establish comparability to major media, and the magazine name submitted did not match the publication claimed.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO had previously vacated the Director's positive finding and maintained this position on motion. Very brief career summaries within multi-page articles about other topics are insufficient to show that articles are 'about' the Petitioner. New evidence of viewership figures did not establish comparability to major media, and the magazine name submitted did not match the publication claimed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_07_B2203; source_row=26244 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the four contracts, when considered on a monthly basis, actually reflected earnings lower than the average monthly salary stated on trud.com. Letters regarding additional earnings were not supported by contracts or payroll documents and were therefore insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the four contracts, when considered on a monthly basis, actually reflected earnings lower than the average monthly salary stated on trud.com. Letters regarding additional earnings were not supported by contracts or payroll documents and were therefore insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_07_B2203; source_row=26248 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that UHCR's membership requirements (professional education, 3+ years experience, awards/diplomas for participation) do not require outstanding achievements. The bylaws translation was incomplete and could not be relied upon. A reference letter contained translation inconsistencies making it unclear whether it described UHCR or a different organization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that UHCR's membership requirements (professional education, 3+ years experience, awards/diplomas for participation) do not require outstanding achievements. The bylaws translation was incomplete and could not be relied upon. A reference letter contained translation inconsistencies making it unclear whether it described UHCR or a different organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_07_B2203; source_row=26243 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The evidence of peer review activity for scientific journals, including an outstanding contributor certificate and multiple review emails, establishes that the Petitioner meets this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The evidence of peer review activity for scientific journals, including an outstanding contributor certificate and multiple review emails, establishes that the Petitioner meets this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_02_B2203; source_row=26209 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
The totality of reference letters and other evidence demonstrates that the Petitioner's software contributions—tsunami modules and Python interpreter—were implemented by individual researchers, research groups, and institutions in civil engineering, leading to broader implementation of the platform. AAO therefore disagreed with the Director and found this criterion met.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The totality of reference letters and other evidence demonstrates that the Petitioner's software contributions—tsunami modules and Python interpreter—were implemented by individual researchers, research groups, and institutions in civil engineering, leading to broader implementation of the platform. AAO therefore disagreed with the Director and found this criterion met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_02_B2203; source_row=26210 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the step-1 threshold, but noted in dicta that the record did not establish the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the step-1 threshold, but noted in dicta that the record did not establish the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_05_B2203; source_row=26235 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed with the Director on both grounds: the certificate was issued to the company, not the Petitioner, and the record lacked objective evidence that the certificate is recognized nationally or internationally — the accompanying letter even stated it was not valid for Ministry matters.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director on both grounds: the certificate was issued to the company, not the Petitioner, and the record lacked objective evidence that the certificate is recognized nationally or internationally — the accompanying letter even stated it was not valid for Ministry matters.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_05_B2203; source_row=26227 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c