Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12711–12720
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
Leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
Reference letters and other evidence establish that the Beneficiary played a critical role for the team creating immersive projects, and the awards received by the petitioner newspaper demonstrate the organization's distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Reference letters and other evidence establish that the Beneficiary played a critical role for the team creating immersive projects, and the awards received by the petitioner newspaper demonstrate the organization's distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_03_B2203; source_row=26218 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the book's contributions were more educational than artistic, and since its 2006 publication the Petitioner's documented work has been in advertising rather than educational materials. The Petitioner also did not provide a basis for comparison to show the impact of his work relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the book's contributions were more educational than artistic, and since its 2006 publication the Petitioner's documented work has been in advertising rather than educational materials. The Petitioner also did not provide a basis for comparison to show the impact of his work relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=26199 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the organizations had distinguished reputations, but the Petitioner's role within specific projects was not necessarily critical to the organizations as a whole. The Petitioner's reliance on the title 'Senior Art Director' alone was insufficient, as he did not adequately establish his duties or submit an organizational chart, and did not show how many senior art directors worked at the company.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the organizations had distinguished reputations, but the Petitioner's role within specific projects was not necessarily critical to the organizations as a whole. The Petitioner's reliance on the title 'Senior Art Director' alone was insufficient, as he did not adequately establish his duties or submit an organizational chart, and did not show how many senior art directors worked at the company.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=26201 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the agency letter was not documentation of the Petitioner's receipt of the prize, but merely an assertion from an individual not involved in selecting winners. The Petitioner established involvement in an award-winning project but not that the award recognized his contributions specifically.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the agency letter was not documentation of the Petitioner's receipt of the prize, but merely an assertion from an individual not involved in selecting winners. The Petitioner established involvement in an award-winning project but not that the award recognized his contributions specifically. The juried exhibitions also did not amount to nationally or internationally recognized prizes because the Petitioner did not establish their significant national or international profile.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=26196 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=26203 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found the evidence did not demonstrate that AAM membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The record lacked information about who evaluated the Petitioner's qualifications, whether those individuals qualify as national or international experts, and objective corroboration of the actual selection criteria.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the evidence did not demonstrate that AAM membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The record lacked information about who evaluated the Petitioner's qualifications, whether those individuals qualify as national or international experts, and objective corroboration of the actual selection criteria. The years-of-experience requirement is not tantamount to an outstanding achievement requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-19_01_B2203; source_row=26186 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner submitted monthly payroll statements and a chart showing the minimum monthly wage for senior account executives from a single Argentine labor union. AAO found this was insufficient comparative data, as minimum wage data from one union does not establish a high salary relative to others in the field, and the Petitioner provided no documentary evidence to support her claims about average salaries.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted monthly payroll statements and a chart showing the minimum monthly wage for senior account executives from a single Argentine labor union. AAO found this was insufficient comparative data, as minimum wage data from one union does not establish a high salary relative to others in the field, and the Petitioner provided no documentary evidence to support her claims about average salaries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-19_01_B2203; source_row=26190 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences118 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that while the Petitioner's work was original and cited by others, the evidence did not establish that his contributions rose to the level of major significance. Expert letters lacked specificity about the broader impact of his work, citation counts were modest and lacked comparative context, journal rankings alone did not demonstrate individual article impact, and media coverage was limited and did not mentio…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that while the Petitioner's work was original and cited by others, the evidence did not establish that his contributions rose to the level of major significance. Expert letters lacked specificity about the broader impact of his work, citation counts were modest and lacked comparative context, journal rankings alone did not demonstrate individual article impact, and media coverage was limited and did not mention the Petitioner by name.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-19_02_B2203; source_row=26194 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c