Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12791–12800
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot established
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that solicited letters were undermined by objective documentation showing exaggeration (e.g., the IEEE Senior Member distinction), that the Petitioner's role in international standards projects was too narrowly and vaguely described to establish major significance, citation counts were uncontextualized, and patents show originality but not significance.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that solicited letters were undermined by objective documentation showing exaggeration (e.g., the IEEE Senior Member distinction), that the Petitioner's role in international standards projects was too narrowly and vaguely described to establish major significance, citation counts were uncontextualized, and patents show originality but not significance. The totality of evidence did not demonstrate extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_02_B2203; source_row=26100 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the letters did not identify any specific contribution or explain its major significance, and rejected the argument that winning competitions itself qualifies because prizes are addressed under a separate criterion.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the letters did not identify any specific contribution or explain its major significance, and rejected the argument that winning competitions itself qualifies because prizes are addressed under a separate criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_03_B2203; source_row=26105 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner failed to establish the publications were professional or major trade publications or major media, noted small circulation, an unverified connection between rus4all.ru and Ria Novosti, and inconsistent characterizations of the publications.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to establish the publications were professional or major trade publications or major media, noted small circulation, an unverified connection between rus4all.ru and Ria Novosti, and inconsistent characterizations of the publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_03_B2203; source_row=26103 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the supporting letter merely parroted regulatory language, did not include the bylaws or verifiable membership requirements, did not establish the writer's authority, and did not establish the club's relationship to the International Federation of Karate.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the supporting letter merely parroted regulatory language, did not include the bylaws or verifiable membership requirements, did not establish the writer's authority, and did not establish the club's relationship to the International Federation of Karate.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_03_B2203; source_row=26102 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration for services
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the evidence deficient because the income list was not contemporaneous, income sources were not itemized, company revenue could not be attributed as personal salary, and the US salary comparisons were anecdotal and geographically inapplicable to Venezuela.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the evidence deficient because the income list was not contemporaneous, income sources were not itemized, company revenue could not be attributed as personal salary, and the US salary comparisons were anecdotal and geographically inapplicable to Venezuela.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=26092 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the criterion was not met on multiple grounds: the pageants' primary purpose is competitive not artistic; the displayed work belongs to the contestants, not their trainer; the fashion shows focused on garments the Petitioner did not design; and the television programs were either reality shows or educational segments, not artistic displays of the Petitioner's work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the criterion was not met on multiple grounds: the pageants' primary purpose is competitive not artistic; the displayed work belongs to the contestants, not their trainer; the fashion shows focused on garments the Petitioner did not design; and the television programs were either reality shows or educational segments, not artistic displays of the Petitioner's work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=26090 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the submitted evidence failed to establish a distinguished reputation for either her school or the television station. The school's reputation was unsupported by comparative evidence, and the television station's distinction rested only on self-promotional materials.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the submitted evidence failed to establish a distinguished reputation for either her school or the television station. The school's reputation was unsupported by comparative evidence, and the television station's distinction rested only on self-promotional materials. Additionally, the Petitioner's relationship with the station was as an independent producer who purchased airtime, not an employee with a leading role within the organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=26091 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c