Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12841–12850
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
The article focused on Petitioner's experience as a working mother rather than her work as an administrative manager, and there was no evidence Working Mom was a professional or major trade publication or major medium.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The article focused on Petitioner's experience as a working mother rather than her work as an administrative manager, and there was no evidence Working Mom was a professional or major trade publication or major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-22_02_B2203; source_row=26041 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that while the record established substantial merit for the Petitioner's work as a financial analyst, his proposed endeavor lacked national importance because it would not impact the financial services industry or U.S. economy more broadly beyond his own employer and clientele, and he failed to demonstrate significant potential for U.S. job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the record established substantial merit for the Petitioner's work as a financial analyst, his proposed endeavor lacked national importance because it would not impact the financial services industry or U.S. economy more broadly beyond his own employer and clientele, and he failed to demonstrate significant potential for U.S. job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-21_02_B5203; source_row=26023 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIEngineerPhD4 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner has conducted, published, and presented research, he has not shown that his work constitutes a record of success or progress in his field, has served as an impetus for progress in aerospace engineering, or has generated substantial positive discourse in the engineering community.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner has conducted, published, and presented research, he has not shown that his work constitutes a record of success or progress in his field, has served as an impetus for progress in aerospace engineering, or has generated substantial positive discourse in the engineering community. His citation counts were low, self-citations were unaccounted for, peer review was limited, and letters of support did not demonstrate adoption of his work by others.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-21_06_B5203; source_row=26036 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that while the record demonstrated substantial merit in the Petitioner's proposed entrepreneurial work, the evidence was insufficient to show that the prospective impact of his specific real estate and business projects would extend broadly enough to reach national importance. The Petitioner did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the record demonstrated substantial merit in the Petitioner's proposed entrepreneurial work, the evidence was insufficient to show that the prospective impact of his specific real estate and business projects would extend broadly enough to reach national importance. The Petitioner did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers, substantial positive economic effects, or that his development activity represented a significant share of the Florida or U.S. real estate market.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-21_03_B5203; source_row=26026 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that although the Petitioner published and presented research, the evidence did not show his work served as an impetus for progress in the field, generated substantial positive discourse, or constituted a record of success. Citation evidence was insufficiently contextualized, peer review activity was occasional, funding attribution was unclear, and no published research since 2014 was documented.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that although the Petitioner published and presented research, the evidence did not show his work served as an impetus for progress in the field, generated substantial positive discourse, or constituted a record of success. Citation evidence was insufficiently contextualized, peer review activity was occasional, funding attribution was unclear, and no published research since 2014 was documented.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-21_05_B5203; source_row=26033 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While the proposed endeavor has substantial merit, it lacks national importance because the Petitioner's instructional activities at a single preschool do not have broader implications for the field or the U.S. economy. A reported teacher shortage does not by itself establish national importance, and the Petitioner has not shown her work has significant potential to employ U.S.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
While the proposed endeavor has substantial merit, it lacks national importance because the Petitioner's instructional activities at a single preschool do not have broader implications for the field or the U.S. economy. A reported teacher shortage does not by itself establish national importance, and the Petitioner has not shown her work has significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-21_01_B5203; source_row=26015 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
No credential evaluation was provided to establish equivalency of foreign credentials to a U.S. advanced degree. Even assuming the bachelor's degree equaled a U.S. baccalaureate, the Petitioner lacked the required five years of post-baccalaureate experience at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
No credential evaluation was provided to establish equivalency of foreign credentials to a U.S. advanced degree. Even assuming the bachelor's degree equaled a U.S. baccalaureate, the Petitioner lacked the required five years of post-baccalaureate experience at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-21_01_B5203; source_row=26008 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not provide salary comparisons from the same time period as her earnings documentation, so there is no basis to determine her earnings are indicative of exceptional ability relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not provide salary comparisons from the same time period as her earnings documentation, so there is no basis to determine her earnings are indicative of exceptional ability relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-21_01_B5203; source_row=26012 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that reference letters speculated on future potential rather than demonstrating current major significance, publication and presentation alone are insufficient, and citations were too modest and uncontextualized to show major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that reference letters speculated on future potential rather than demonstrating current major significance, publication and presentation alone are insufficient, and citations were too modest and uncontextualized to show major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-21_01_B2203; source_row=26004 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that neither ACM-CWC's scholarships committee nor ACM-CBCBHI's program committee demonstrated that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The IEEE Senior membership claim was rejected because it post-dated the petition filing by one year.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that neither ACM-CWC's scholarships committee nor ACM-CBCBHI's program committee demonstrated that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The IEEE Senior membership claim was rejected because it post-dated the petition filing by one year.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-21_01_B2203; source_row=26002 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c