Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12931–12940
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences22 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that citation counts (maximum 22 over eight years) were not shown to reflect major significance; the patent application was not approved and even approved patents reflect originality rather than major significance; the supplement's 9,000 bottles sold was not contextualized; and collaborator letters acknowledged the research results were still tentative pending human studies.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that citation counts (maximum 22 over eight years) were not shown to reflect major significance; the patent application was not approved and even approved patents reflect originality rather than major significance; the supplement's 9,000 bottles sold was not contextualized; and collaborator letters acknowledged the research results were still tentative pending human studies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-06-09_03_B2203; source_row=25935 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because only two criteria were met. In briefly addressing the Director's findings, AAO agreed that success and productivity are not the same as acclaim, and the record does not establish that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because only two criteria were met. In briefly addressing the Director's findings, AAO agreed that success and productivity are not the same as acclaim, and the record does not establish that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-06-09_03_B2203; source_row=25938 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
None of the six claimed awards qualified: the Who's Who entry is not a prize or award; the Long Service Award recognizes employment tenure and job performance rather than field excellence and is limited to one university's employees; the government scholarship funded graduate studies rather than recognizing excellence; the Nigeria High Commission award lacks documentation of its purpose; and the two conference presentation…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
None of the six claimed awards qualified: the Who's Who entry is not a prize or award; the Long Service Award recognizes employment tenure and job performance rather than field excellence and is limited to one university's employees; the government scholarship funded graduate studies rather than recognizing excellence; the Nigeria High Commission award lacks documentation of its purpose; and the two conference presentation prizes were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-06-09_03_B2203; source_row=25932 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found insufficient independent evidence that membership qualifications for the associations require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. For the Kung Fu Association, other than a WMAC designation, little information about membership requirements was provided.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found insufficient independent evidence that membership qualifications for the associations require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. For the Kung Fu Association, other than a WMAC designation, little information about membership requirements was provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-06-09_01_B2203; source_row=25925 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record insufficient to confirm national or international recognition of the award, noting lack of official event results, competitor lists, entrance requirements, or media coverage. Testimonial letters from individuals without martial arts expertise were insufficient to establish national or international recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record insufficient to confirm national or international recognition of the award, noting lack of official event results, competitor lists, entrance requirements, or media coverage. Testimonial letters from individuals without martial arts expertise were insufficient to establish national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-06-09_01_B2203; source_row=25924 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c