Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because it lacked reasoning. On de novo review, AAO found the AMA lacked demonstrated national or international significance, with only two website articles as media coverage and no evidence of national/international news exposure. The Cannes selection was not a prize or award, and directing a film falls outside the Petitioner's declared field of set design.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because it lacked reasoning. On de novo review, AAO found the AMA lacked demonstrated national or international significance, with only two website articles as media coverage and no evidence of national/international news exposure. The Cannes selection was not a prize or award, and directing a film falls outside the Petitioner's declared field of set design.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_02_B2203; source_row=25835 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters do not contain detailed information demonstrating the Petitioner performed in a critical role as a whole, failing to explain how his roles resulted in the organizations' success or standing. Additionally, the Petitioner did not establish that either organization enjoys a distinguished reputation, providing only unsupported assertions without corroborating documentation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters do not contain detailed information demonstrating the Petitioner performed in a critical role as a whole, failing to explain how his roles resulted in the organizations' success or standing. Additionally, the Petitioner did not establish that either organization enjoys a distinguished reputation, providing only unsupported assertions without corroborating documentation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_05_B2203; source_row=25853 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters praising the Petitioner's skills lack specificity and use hyperbolic language without demonstrating that his contributions have been widely implemented, have remarkably impacted the field, or have influenced others. The record also lacks corroborating documentation showing that his compositions, arrangements, or concert performances have widely influenced others in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The letters praising the Petitioner's skills lack specificity and use hyperbolic language without demonstrating that his contributions have been widely implemented, have remarkably impacted the field, or have influenced others. The record also lacks corroborating documentation showing that his compositions, arrangements, or concert performances have widely influenced others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_05_B2203; source_row=25851 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The CCTV screenshots lacked a required author, the material was about a topic rather than about the Petitioner personally, and the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that cctv.com or viponline.cctv.com constitutes a major medium using independent objective evidence.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The CCTV screenshots lacked a required author, the material was about a topic rather than about the Petitioner personally, and the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that cctv.com or viponline.cctv.com constitutes a major medium using independent objective evidence. The China Youth Daily article only briefly mentioned the Petitioner once in a quote and was not about her, and the Petitioner did not establish China Youth Daily or cyol.net as a major medium through independent evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_07_B2203; source_row=25861 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record did not support the Petitioner's claim of leading the welfare program, as the program predated her involvement by three years and the documentation contradicted her claimed title of 'President.' The Petitioner failed to show that any projects were her original contributions, that the media articles credited her with any original contributions, or that the welfare activities had major significance in the field ove…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The record did not support the Petitioner's claim of leading the welfare program, as the program predated her involvement by three years and the documentation contradicted her claimed title of 'President.' The Petitioner failed to show that any projects were her original contributions, that the media articles credited her with any original contributions, or that the welfare activities had major significance in the field overall rather than just in one province. Support letters were conclusory and lacked specific detail about how her contributions influenced the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_07_B2203; source_row=25863 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the support letter lacked detail showing the Petitioner's role was critical to the organization's outcomes, and the Petitioner did not establish that the organization has a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the support letter lacked detail showing the Petitioner's role was critical to the organization's outcomes, and the Petitioner did not establish that the organization has a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_09_B2203; source_row=25873 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the evidence did not show national or international recognition of the NYIAAPC first prize (limited age range, $1,000 prize, no objective evidence of significance) or the IBLAGPIC award (inconsistencies as to which award was received and lack of evidence of recognition in the field).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the evidence did not show national or international recognition of the NYIAAPC first prize (limited age range, $1,000 prize, no objective evidence of significance) or the IBLAGPIC award (inconsistencies as to which award was received and lack of evidence of recognition in the field).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_09_B2203; source_row=25869 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found Music Review and Music Journal were not shown to be professional or major trade publications, and the KBS radio/TV programs were not shown to be major media or to be 'about' the Petitioner relating to her work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found Music Review and Music Journal were not shown to be professional or major trade publications, and the KBS radio/TV programs were not shown to be major media or to be 'about' the Petitioner relating to her work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_09_B2203; source_row=25870 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because step 1 was not satisfied, but observed that the aggregate record would not support sustained acclaim or top-of-field status in any event.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because step 1 was not satisfied, but observed that the aggregate record would not support sustained acclaim or top-of-field status in any event.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_09_B2203; source_row=25874 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters lacked specific information establishing leading or critical roles; no organizational chart or other evidence showed the Petitioner's position relative to overall hierarchies; evidence of the organization's distinguished reputation was insufficient and post-dated the filing; and the Petitioner did not show how his roles were responsible for the organizations' success or standing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters lacked specific information establishing leading or critical roles; no organizational chart or other evidence showed the Petitioner's position relative to overall hierarchies; evidence of the organization's distinguished reputation was insufficient and post-dated the filing; and the Petitioner did not show how his roles were responsible for the organizations' success or standing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_10_B2203; source_row=25879 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c