Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 12981–12990
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other17 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The article was not about the Petitioner—it was about a startup competition—and the Petitioner failed to establish that the Albany Times Union qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The article was not about the Petitioner—it was about a startup competition—and the Petitioner failed to establish that the Albany Times Union qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_10_B2203; source_row=25876 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other17 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's 17 cumulative citations were insufficient to demonstrate major significance; recommendation letters were either non-specific, used identical language suggesting they were not independently written, or described only prospective impact; patent applications show originality but not major significance; and individual clinical accomplishments do not demonstrate field-wide impact.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's 17 cumulative citations were insufficient to demonstrate major significance; recommendation letters were either non-specific, used identical language suggesting they were not independently written, or described only prospective impact; patent applications show originality but not major significance; and individual clinical accomplishments do not demonstrate field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_10_B2203; source_row=25877 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's finding, concluding that the Petitioner failed to identify which artistic exhibitions or showcases displayed the films, that the IMDb screenshots did not corroborate his claimed contributions, and that as a producer/coordinator he did not demonstrate that he personally displayed his own work rather than overseeing others.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's finding, concluding that the Petitioner failed to identify which artistic exhibitions or showcases displayed the films, that the IMDb screenshots did not corroborate his claimed contributions, and that as a producer/coordinator he did not demonstrate that he personally displayed his own work rather than overseeing others.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_11_B2203; source_row=25883 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
For PGA, the Petitioner failed to show that its membership requirements rise to the level of 'outstanding achievements' and did not establish that the membership committee consists of recognized national or international experts. For DADAA, the Petitioner submitted only a membership card and screenshots about radio drama auditions that were irrelevant to DADAA's membership requirements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
For PGA, the Petitioner failed to show that its membership requirements rise to the level of 'outstanding achievements' and did not establish that the membership committee consists of recognized national or international experts. For DADAA, the Petitioner submitted only a membership card and screenshots about radio drama auditions that were irrelevant to DADAA's membership requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_11_B2203; source_row=25881 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters generally described the Petitioner's job responsibilities without specifically showing how he critically contributed to the success of the organizations as a whole. The line producer and production coordinator roles are subordinate positions in the production hierarchy. The Petitioner also failed to demonstrate that the organizations themselves have distinguished reputations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters generally described the Petitioner's job responsibilities without specifically showing how he critically contributed to the success of the organizations as a whole. The line producer and production coordinator roles are subordinate positions in the production hierarchy. The Petitioner also failed to demonstrate that the organizations themselves have distinguished reputations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_11_B2203; source_row=25884 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The recommendation letters do not specifically identify the Petitioner's contributions or explain how they have significantly impacted or unusually influenced the field. The letters use hyperbolic language without the specificity needed to demonstrate major significance, and having a diverse or special skill set is not itself a contribution of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The recommendation letters do not specifically identify the Petitioner's contributions or explain how they have significantly impacted or unusually influenced the field. The letters use hyperbolic language without the specificity needed to demonstrate major significance, and having a diverse or special skill set is not itself a contribution of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_11_B2203; source_row=25882 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that none of the Wikipedia, IMDb, or The Numbers screenshots credited the Petitioner with working on the films, and the HR letter only confirmed his producing roles without showing he was responsible for the commercial success of those films.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that none of the Wikipedia, IMDb, or The Numbers screenshots credited the Petitioner with working on the films, and the HR letter only confirmed his producing roles without showing he was responsible for the commercial success of those films.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_11_B2203; source_row=25885 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the supporting letter for the 2008 National Downhill Championship focused on history and background without demonstrating national or international significance; the 2016 Mountain Bike Series evidence did not mention the 2016 event or confirm the Petitioner received a second-place medal; and the 2015 European Games certificate reflected only a participation award with the Petitioner finishing 37th, not a…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the supporting letter for the 2008 National Downhill Championship focused on history and background without demonstrating national or international significance; the 2016 Mountain Bike Series evidence did not mention the 2016 event or confirm the Petitioner received a second-place medal; and the 2015 European Games certificate reflected only a participation award with the Petitioner finishing 37th, not a prize or award for excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_04_B2203; source_row=25846 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI1,131 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's citation record, Clarivate Analytics percentile data, recommendation letters, and patents did not sufficiently demonstrate that his work constitutes original contributions of major significance in the field.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's citation record, Clarivate Analytics percentile data, recommendation letters, and patents did not sufficiently demonstrate that his work constitutes original contributions of major significance in the field. Citations and comparative ranking do not automatically establish major significance, letters lacked specificity, and patents without evidence of commercialization or widespread adoption do not meet the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=25832 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments that have a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the organizational charts did not establish the Petitioner held a leading position in the overall hierarchy of the companies, and the letters of recommendation lacked detailed, probative information showing his role was critical to the organizations' overall success. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to establish the distinguished reputation of at least one of the three employers.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the organizational charts did not establish the Petitioner held a leading position in the overall hierarchy of the companies, and the letters of recommendation lacked detailed, probative information showing his role was critical to the organizations' overall success. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to establish the distinguished reputation of at least one of the three employers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_03_B2203; source_row=25844 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c