Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded the Petitioner displayed her work at artistic, musical venues that qualify as artistic exhibitions or showcases, and therefore satisfies this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Petitioner displayed her work at artistic, musical venues that qualify as artistic exhibitions or showcases, and therefore satisfies this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_09_B2203; source_row=25872 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the Director improperly imposed additional evidentiary requirements beyond the plain language of the criterion. The record shows 11 published articles in professional scientific journals, which satisfies this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Director improperly imposed additional evidentiary requirements beyond the plain language of the criterion. The record shows 11 published articles in professional scientific journals, which satisfies this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_10_B2203; source_row=25878 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other17 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_10_B2203; source_row=25880 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step one, but noted in the aggregate that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria at step one, but noted in the aggregate that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_11_B2203; source_row=25886 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the published material criterion, although this finding alone was insufficient to meet the three-criterion threshold.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the published material criterion, although this finding alone was insufficient to meet the three-criterion threshold.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_04_B2203; source_row=25847 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI1,131 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of meeting at least three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of meeting at least three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=25834 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the judging criterion, noting his participation as a judge for two youth film/video competitions.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the judging criterion, noting his participation as a judge for two youth film/video competitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_03_B2203; source_row=25840 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the display criterion based on exhibition of his works at design exhibitions and film festivals.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the display criterion based on exhibition of his works at design exhibitions and film festivals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_03_B2203; source_row=25841 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c