Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards
What the decision said
The Director found that the Petitioner did not satisfy the awards criterion. The Petitioner did not contest this on appeal, so AAO deemed the issue waived.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Director found that the Petitioner did not satisfy the awards criterion. The Petitioner did not contest this on appeal, so AAO deemed the issue waived.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_03_B2203; source_row=25842 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the step-1 threshold, but noted that review of the aggregate record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the step-1 threshold, but noted that review of the aggregate record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-29_03_B2203; source_row=25845 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The media appearances were about the Petitioner's employer and its services, not about the Petitioner herself relating to her work. The article identifies her as an expert on the subject but is not about her. The Petitioner's media appearances were made as part of her marketing duties to promote her employers' services and products.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The media appearances were about the Petitioner's employer and its services, not about the Petitioner herself relating to her work. The article identifies her as an expert on the subject but is not about her. The Petitioner's media appearances were made as part of her marketing duties to promote her employers' services and products.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_04_B2203; source_row=25808 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The awards and certificates came from local or regional ethnic associations and do not reflect excellence in the field of business development and marketing. The 2019 letter submitted in response to the RFE substantially revised the stated reason for the award in a way that raises serious credibility questions. The NATA certificate was vague and may simply acknowledge attendance.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The awards and certificates came from local or regional ethnic associations and do not reflect excellence in the field of business development and marketing. The 2019 letter submitted in response to the RFE substantially revised the stated reason for the award in a way that raises serious credibility questions. The NATA certificate was vague and may simply acknowledge attendance. The ATA YouTube video was of poor quality and did not demonstrate receipt of a prize or award for excellence in her field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_04_B2203; source_row=25807 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that citation volume and geographic distribution of citing authors were not self-evident indicia of sustained acclaim; the technology remained in a preliminary stage with no confirmed adoption beyond prototypes; and the practical applications of the research did not demonstrate the sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that citation volume and geographic distribution of citing authors were not self-evident indicia of sustained acclaim; the technology remained in a preliminary stage with no confirmed adoption beyond prototypes; and the practical applications of the research did not demonstrate the sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_02_B2203; source_row=25799 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner did not establish that she performed in a leading or critical role for productions with distinguished reputations. Projects still in production could not have an established reputation; on completed major films she held lower-ranking roles; and the one art director credit was as one of ten art directors with several who outranked her.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner did not establish that she performed in a leading or critical role for productions with distinguished reputations. Projects still in production could not have an established reputation; on completed major films she held lower-ranking roles; and the one art director credit was as one of ten art directors with several who outranked her. Expert letters asserting her substantial credit were not sufficiently corroborated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_01_B2203; source_row=25792 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or other significantly high remuneration for services
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the comparison inadequate because the BLS figures cited were for art directors across all industries rather than specifically in the motion picture industry. Additionally, the Petitioner's hourly wage calculation improperly assumed a 40-hour work week when evidence suggested 60-hour weeks, and the weekly pay receipts did not document her total annual earnings.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the comparison inadequate because the BLS figures cited were for art directors across all industries rather than specifically in the motion picture industry. Additionally, the Petitioner's hourly wage calculation improperly assumed a 40-hour work week when evidence suggested 60-hour weeks, and the weekly pay receipts did not document her total annual earnings.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_01_B2203; source_row=25793 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the submitted letters attested to the Petitioner's talent and listed her credits but did not explain the major significance of specific contributions she has made to the field. General praise does not demonstrate that contributions have been widely implemented, remarkably impacted, or risen to the level of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the submitted letters attested to the Petitioner's talent and listed her credits but did not explain the major significance of specific contributions she has made to the field. General praise does not demonstrate that contributions have been widely implemented, remarkably impacted, or risen to the level of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_01_B2203; source_row=25790 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c