Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13031–13040
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
AAO reserved analysis of criterion (v) because even if satisfied, it could not change the outcome given that the Petitioner could not meet at least three criteria.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved analysis of criterion (v) because even if satisfied, it could not change the outcome given that the Petitioner could not meet at least three criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_04_B2203; source_row=25809 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner's earlier positions were supported only by her own résumé rather than independent evidence. For the more recent positions, the documents regarding company reputation were mostly self-generated promotional materials.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner's earlier positions were supported only by her own résumé rather than independent evidence. For the more recent positions, the documents regarding company reputation were mostly self-generated promotional materials. The one third-party article was of questionable reliability and referred to the international parent organization rather than the specific entity for which the Petitioner worked.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_04_B2203; source_row=25811 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's highly-cited publications (including one in the top 0.01% of engineering articles from 2013), letters describing a breakthrough in battery-free phone technology, citing articles noting the Petitioner 'introduced' a low-power communications medium, and mainstream press coverage in Fortune, Forbes, and Reuters collectively established original contributions of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's highly-cited publications (including one in the top 0.01% of engineering articles from 2013), letters describing a breakthrough in battery-free phone technology, citing articles noting the Petitioner 'introduced' a low-power communications medium, and mainstream press coverage in Fortune, Forbes, and Reuters collectively established original contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_02_B2203; source_row=25797 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the nomination for 'Best Production Design / Art Direction' at a film festival, in a category directly related to the Petitioner's role, constituted recognition of her actual work. Festival screenings focused on artistic merit constitute artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the nomination for 'Best Production Design / Art Direction' at a film festival, in a category directly related to the Petitioner's role, constituted recognition of her actual work. Festival screenings focused on artistic merit constitute artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_01_B2203; source_row=25791 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of satisfying at least three criteria. AAO nonetheless noted the record in the aggregate would not demonstrate the required sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of satisfying at least three criteria. AAO nonetheless noted the record in the aggregate would not demonstrate the required sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_01_B2203; source_row=25795 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that at least some submitted articles met the criterion's requirements. Specifically, an article in The Hindu, documented as one of India's highest-circulation daily newspapers, satisfied the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that at least some submitted articles met the criterion's requirements. Specifically, an article in The Hindu, documented as one of India's highest-circulation daily newspapers, satisfied the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_01_B2203; source_row=25789 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
The articles were all derived from a single press release and were not 'about' the Petitioner; she was mentioned only as one of two students who co-led an effort, with research attributed to the faculty director. The regulatory requirement that material be 'about the alien' was not satisfied.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The articles were all derived from a single press release and were not 'about' the Petitioner; she was mentioned only as one of two students who co-led an effort, with research attributed to the faculty director. The regulatory requirement that material be 'about the alien' was not satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_07_B2203; source_row=25826 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidence threshold of at least three criteria. AAO nonetheless noted in advisory dicta that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidence threshold of at least three criteria. AAO nonetheless noted in advisory dicta that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-28_07_B2203; source_row=25830 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c