Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13091–13100
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved this issue pending the Director's new decision on Step 1 criteria on remand.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this issue pending the Director's new decision on Step 1 criteria on remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_08_B2203; source_row=25758 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or other remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Director's conclusion was based on a factual error — the Petitioner did in fact address the criterion in the RFE response with clarifying and additional evidence. AAO remanded for a new determination considering all evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Director's conclusion was based on a factual error — the Petitioner did in fact address the criterion in the RFE response with clarifying and additional evidence. AAO remanded for a new determination considering all evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_08_B2203; source_row=25757 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion considered the initial evidence and the Petitioner's RFE response and provided a sufficient explanation; AAO did not disturb the Director's finding but the matter is remanded overall.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion considered the initial evidence and the Petitioner's RFE response and provided a sufficient explanation; AAO did not disturb the Director's finding but the matter is remanded overall.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_08_B2203; source_row=25753 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion was sufficient and did not disturb the finding, noting it considered the initial evidence and RFE response.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion was sufficient and did not disturb the finding, noting it considered the initial evidence and RFE response.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_08_B2203; source_row=25756 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Director's analysis was inadequate because it acknowledged only advertising campaigns in the RFE, did not refer to specific letters or categories of evidence in the denial, and failed to explain why the totality of evidence did not meet the criterion. AAO remanded for a new determination.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis was inadequate because it acknowledged only advertising campaigns in the RFE, did not refer to specific letters or categories of evidence in the denial, and failed to explain why the totality of evidence did not meet the criterion. AAO remanded for a new determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_08_B2203; source_row=25755 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Same translation-certification issue as criterion (iii); AAO finds the certifications adequate and remands for proper evaluation including new evidence on appeal.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
Same translation-certification issue as criterion (iii); AAO finds the certifications adequate and remands for proper evaluation including new evidence on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_13_B2203; source_row=25782 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
What the decision said
AAO observes that the Director failed to evaluate the awards evidence despite the Petitioner's claim under this criterion in both the initial filing and RFE response, and remands for evaluation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO observes that the Director failed to evaluate the awards evidence despite the Petitioner's claim under this criterion in both the initial filing and RFE response, and remands for evaluation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_13_B2203; source_row=25780 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
AAO finds the Director improperly limited his analysis to reference letters and overlooked the Petitioner's thirteen albums, live and televised performances, and social media evidence; remands for full review.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the Director improperly limited his analysis to reference letters and overlooked the Petitioner's thirteen albums, live and televised performances, and social media evidence; remands for full review.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_13_B2203; source_row=25783 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major media
What the decision said
AAO finds the Director erred in rejecting the translator certifications as non-compliant with 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3) and remands for evaluation of the translated documents along with new evidence submitted on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the Director erred in rejecting the translator certifications as non-compliant with 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3) and remands for evaluation of the translated documents along with new evidence submitted on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_13_B2203; source_row=25781 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c