Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13101–13110
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed the petitioner met this criterion through her service as head of the regional government's animal welfare department, though noting the director did not specify the qualifying role or organization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the petitioner met this criterion through her service as head of the regional government's animal welfare department, though noting the director did not specify the qualifying role or organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_03_B2203; source_row=25734 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The regulation does not require that an individual be selected as a judge on the basis of extraordinary ability; the evidence shows she made decisions regarding funding applications submitted by local animal welfare groups as a committee member.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The regulation does not require that an individual be selected as a judge on the basis of extraordinary ability; the evidence shows she made decisions regarding funding applications submitted by local animal welfare groups as a committee member.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_03_B2203; source_row=25732 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed the denial, finding that the bulk of the Petitioner's citations related to a prior research field she no longer pursues; her citation rates in her current field were not objectively top-tier; her peer review activity was limited in duration and quantity; expert letters repeated statutory language without sufficient corroboration; favorable recent evidence post-dated filing; and her comparison to leading scienti…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the denial, finding that the bulk of the Petitioner's citations related to a prior research field she no longer pursues; her citation rates in her current field were not objectively top-tier; her peer review activity was limited in duration and quantity; expert letters repeated statutory language without sufficient corroboration; favorable recent evidence post-dated filing; and her comparison to leading scientists was not persuasive given the vast differences in overall accomplishments.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_12_B2203; source_row=25779 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold requirement of at least three criteria, but noted in passing that the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold requirement of at least three criteria, but noted in passing that the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_10_B2203; source_row=25770 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the claimed dates and title of the Petitioner's leadership position changed between submissions without explanation, that other letters from team representatives did not corroborate the captain claim, and that no bylaws, rules of competition, or independent documentation confirmed his election as team captain for five consecutive years.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the claimed dates and title of the Petitioner's leadership position changed between submissions without explanation, that other letters from team representatives did not corroborate the captain claim, and that no bylaws, rules of competition, or independent documentation confirmed his election as team captain for five consecutive years. AAO also questioned the plausibility given the Petitioner was 18 years old at the start of his claimed tenure.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_10_B2203; source_row=25769 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's silver and bronze medals at the Championship of Uzbekistan and his national championship titles were sufficient to meet this criterion, because the Championship of Uzbekistan is sanctioned by the national federation and the Uzbekistan Ministry of Physical Culture and Sports, making it the official national championship.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's silver and bronze medals at the Championship of Uzbekistan and his national championship titles were sufficient to meet this criterion, because the Championship of Uzbekistan is sanctioned by the national federation and the Uzbekistan Ministry of Physical Culture and Sports, making it the official national championship.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-27_10_B2203; source_row=25765 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the record lacked supporting evidence from any federal agencies to corroborate the claimed 'billions of dollars' in savings. The Petitioner's consulting work did not show prospective impact beyond her employer and clientele sufficient to meet the national importance standard. Her skills and experience are considerations under prong 2, not prong 1.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the record lacked supporting evidence from any federal agencies to corroborate the claimed 'billions of dollars' in savings. The Petitioner's consulting work did not show prospective impact beyond her employer and clientele sufficient to meet the national importance standard. Her skills and experience are considerations under prong 2, not prong 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-01_01_B5203; source_row=25715 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
One-time major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that a one-time achievement must be interpreted very narrowly consistent with legislative history, requiring global scope and international recognition beyond just the field. The IBJJF World Championship did not demonstrate broad, significant, and international press coverage, nor general public recognition comparable to a Nobel Prize or Olympic Medal; evidence was limited to jiu-jitsu-focused websites.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that a one-time achievement must be interpreted very narrowly consistent with legislative history, requiring global scope and international recognition beyond just the field. The IBJJF World Championship did not demonstrate broad, significant, and international press coverage, nor general public recognition comparable to a Nobel Prize or Olympic Medal; evidence was limited to jiu-jitsu-focused websites.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-05-01_01_B2203; source_row=25710 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c