Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The comparable evidence argument failed for the same reasons as under criterion (vii). Additionally, the Petitioner did not show that his specific work was responsible for increased circulation, views, or followers, nor that such metrics are truly comparable to commercial successes in the performing arts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The comparable evidence argument failed for the same reasons as under criterion (vii). Additionally, the Petitioner did not show that his specific work was responsible for increased circulation, views, or followers, nor that such metrics are truly comparable to commercial successes in the performing arts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_07_B2203; source_row=25697 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other500 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The articles lacked identified authors (a regulatory requirement), most articles were not about the Petitioner but about the publication or events, and the Petitioner failed to show that the outlets (diversomagazine.com, guia.com) qualified as major media. The YouTube video lacked a transcription and the channel was not shown to be a major medium.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The articles lacked identified authors (a regulatory requirement), most articles were not about the Petitioner but about the publication or events, and the Petitioner failed to show that the outlets (diversomagazine.com, guia.com) qualified as major media. The YouTube video lacked a transcription and the channel was not shown to be a major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_07_B2203; source_row=25692 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other500 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO noted it need not conduct a formal final merits determination given the Petitioner's failure to meet the initial evidence threshold, but reviewed the record in aggregate and found it insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted it need not conduct a formal final merits determination given the Petitioner's failure to meet the initial evidence threshold, but reviewed the record in aggregate and found it insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_07_B2203; source_row=25698 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not show that publishing articles online or reporting at an event constitutes displaying work at artistic venues. The comparable evidence argument also failed because the Petitioner did not demonstrate why the standard criteria could not apply to his occupation, particularly since he claimed to meet seven other criteria.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not show that publishing articles online or reporting at an event constitutes displaying work at artistic venues. The comparable evidence argument also failed because the Petitioner did not demonstrate why the standard criteria could not apply to his occupation, particularly since he claimed to meet seven other criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_07_B2203; source_row=25694 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that while the Petitioner has conducted, published, and presented research, she has not shown that her work constitutes a record of success or that it has served as an impetus for progress in the medical field, affected diagnostic or treatment protocols, generated substantial positive discourse, or that her citation counts reflect sufficient interest from relevant parties.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner has conducted, published, and presented research, she has not shown that her work constitutes a record of success or that it has served as an impetus for progress in the medical field, affected diagnostic or treatment protocols, generated substantial positive discourse, or that her citation counts reflect sufficient interest from relevant parties.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_02_B5203; source_row=25670 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The book lacked required date information; two articles post-dated the petition filing; prosoundnetwork.com and musicconnection.com evidence did not establish major medium status. USCIS need not rely on the publisher's self-promotional claims and the Petitioner offered no independent circulation data.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The book lacked required date information; two articles post-dated the petition filing; prosoundnetwork.com and musicconnection.com evidence did not establish major medium status. USCIS need not rely on the publisher's self-promotional claims and the Petitioner offered no independent circulation data.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_01_B2203; source_row=25657 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not demonstrate authorship of scholarly articles—one book merely quoted him, another was written by others and included only his advice, and for the third he did not show what he contributed. None of the materials were shown to be written for learned persons with profound knowledge of the field, nor were the books established as professional or major trade publications.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not demonstrate authorship of scholarly articles—one book merely quoted him, another was written by others and included only his advice, and for the third he did not show what he contributed. None of the materials were shown to be written for learned persons with profound knowledge of the field, nor were the books established as professional or major trade publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_01_B2203; source_row=25658 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner submitted a certificate acknowledging participation on a Grammy-nominated recording, not a Grammy Award itself. The Petitioner did not show he received a prize or award from the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted a certificate acknowledging participation on a Grammy-nominated recording, not a Grammy Award itself. The Petitioner did not show he received a prize or award from the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_01_B2203; source_row=25656 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his contributions were of major significance. His citation numbers were drastically reduced when self-citations were excluded, he did not show how his citations compared to those of majorly significant works in the field, journal rankings alone do not establish major significance, letters from references were conclusory without explaining how the work impacted the field, and his con…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his contributions were of major significance. His citation numbers were drastically reduced when self-citations were excluded, he did not show how his citations compared to those of majorly significant works in the field, journal rankings alone do not establish major significance, letters from references were conclusory without explaining how the work impacted the field, and his contribution to the highly-cited SDSS paper was unclear given his role as one of over 300 authors.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_06_B2203; source_row=25688 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences12 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, though it noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, though it noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_02_B2203; source_row=25668 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c