Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_02_B2203; source_row=25666 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed the record supports a finding of substantial merit and national importance, noting the growing healthcare analytics market, letters from a public health professor and a senior director of patient service operations describing broad benefits of the Petitioner's research, and dissemination of results through medical journals and conferences.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the record supports a finding of substantial merit and national importance, noting the growing healthcare analytics market, letters from a public health professor and a senior director of patient service operations describing broad benefits of the Petitioner's research, and dissemination of results through medical journals and conferences.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_02_B5203; source_row=25669 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination because the threshold of three criteria was not met, but noted the aggregate record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination because the threshold of three criteria was not met, but noted the aggregate record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_01_B2203; source_row=25661 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's extensive record of success as an entrepreneur in South Korea—including commercializing CBS technology as a national alert system, listing his company on KOSDAQ, securing ten licensing deals, and obtaining a U.S. letter of intent—demonstrates he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor in the United States.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's extensive record of success as an entrepreneur in South Korea—including commercializing CBS technology as a national alert system, listing his company on KOSDAQ, securing ten licensing deals, and obtaining a U.S. letter of intent—demonstrates he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor in the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_01_B5203; source_row=25663 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer and labor certification
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's track record of successful research and development work and the potential of that work to advance U.S. emergency broadcasting and technological interests means his contributions would benefit the United States even assuming other qualified U.S. workers are available.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's track record of successful research and development work and the potential of that work to advance U.S. emergency broadcasting and technological interests means his contributions would benefit the United States even assuming other qualified U.S. workers are available.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_01_B5203; source_row=25664 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the letters of support and documentation showing the broader implications of the Petitioner's work on mobile multimedia broadcasting services in the United States, including contributions to emergency broadcasting systems, established national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the letters of support and documentation showing the broader implications of the Petitioner's work on mobile multimedia broadcasting services in the United States, including contributions to emergency broadcasting systems, established national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_01_B5203; source_row=25662 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner authored two scholarly articles published in professional publications, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion, contrary to the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner authored two scholarly articles published in professional publications, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion, contrary to the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_04_B2203; source_row=25679 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's single judging event, two older articles with limited citation impact, high salary without comparative benchmarking, minimal press coverage, committee memberships, and letters of dubious authenticity, taken together, did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the managed pressure drilling engineering field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's single judging event, two older articles with limited citation impact, high salary without comparative benchmarking, minimal press coverage, committee memberships, and letters of dubious authenticity, taken together, did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the managed pressure drilling engineering field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-29_04_B2203; source_row=25681 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c