Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in advisory dicta that the record would not support sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in advisory dicta that the record would not support sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-27_01_B2203; source_row=25644 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
AAO reserved the criterion (v) finding because even if met, the Petitioner could only satisfy two of the three required criteria and the appeal outcome would not change.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the criterion (v) finding because even if met, the Petitioner could only satisfy two of the three required criteria and the appeal outcome would not change.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-27_02_B2203; source_row=25646 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the submitted articles are scholarly in nature and appeared in professional publications, finding the Director's characterization unsupported by the record.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the submitted articles are scholarly in nature and appeared in professional publications, finding the Director's characterization unsupported by the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-27_02_B2203; source_row=25647 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering30 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's letters described original work in drug discovery but referred only in general terms to future promise and potential. Closely-held trade secrets not yet in clinical trials cannot demonstrate major significance. Citation counts of 30 were insufficient to show the work influenced the field at the level of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's letters described original work in drug discovery but referred only in general terms to future promise and potential. Closely-held trade secrets not yet in clinical trials cannot demonstrate major significance. Citation counts of 30 were insufficient to show the work influenced the field at the level of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_07_B2203; source_row=25568 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner abandoned his claim regarding one organization on appeal. As to his employer, the company's documented track record consisted only of fundraising and closely-held trade secrets; no approved drugs, no proven effectiveness, and local media attention did not establish a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner abandoned his claim regarding one organization on appeal. As to his employer, the company's documented track record consisted only of fundraising and closely-held trade secrets; no approved drugs, no proven effectiveness, and local media attention did not establish a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_07_B2203; source_row=25570 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The testimonial letters praised the Beneficiary's technical skills but did not identify specific original contributions or explain how he has remarkably impacted or influenced the field. Letters lacking specifics about the impact of contributions do not establish major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The testimonial letters praised the Beneficiary's technical skills but did not identify specific original contributions or explain how he has remarkably impacted or influenced the field. Letters lacking specifics about the impact of contributions do not establish major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_19_B2203; source_row=25631 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The company award was not received by the individual beneficiary. The two remaining awards lacked evidence of national or international significance, and the record did not establish the criteria used or number of competitors for those awards.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The company award was not received by the individual beneficiary. The two remaining awards lacked evidence of national or international significance, and the record did not establish the criteria used or number of competitors for those awards.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_19_B2203; source_row=25628 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The limited information about membership selection criteria did not establish that the Beneficiary, admitted at age 19 or 20, was required to demonstrate outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. No by-laws or other primary documentation were provided.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The limited information about membership selection criteria did not establish that the Beneficiary, admitted at age 19 or 20, was required to demonstrate outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. No by-laws or other primary documentation were provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_19_B2203; source_row=25629 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c