Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13181–13190
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Salary Expert data showed that the average salary for a senior level blacksmith with at least eight years of experience is $62,722, and the Beneficiary has significantly more experience. His earnings are at most slightly above average and do not reflect significantly high remuneration.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Salary Expert data showed that the average salary for a senior level blacksmith with at least eight years of experience is $62,722, and the Beneficiary has significantly more experience. His earnings are at most slightly above average and do not reflect significantly high remuneration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_19_B2203; source_row=25634 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The Daily News Hungary article lacked supporting evidence that it qualifies as major media, was primarily about the company president rather than the Beneficiary, the Kozterkep article lacked a certified translation and author identification, and another article lacked the original foreign-language version, author, and date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The Daily News Hungary article lacked supporting evidence that it qualifies as major media, was primarily about the company president rather than the Beneficiary, the Kozterkep article lacked a certified translation and author identification, and another article lacked the original foreign-language version, author, and date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_19_B2203; source_row=25630 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
PhysicsPhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner's expert letters, citation statistics, and citation records established productive research relied upon by others, they did not demonstrate that the Petitioner's contributions were of major significance in the field of physics. The expert letters lacked specificity about concrete impact, the citation comparisons lacked proper context, and citation rankings alone were insufficient.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's expert letters, citation statistics, and citation records established productive research relied upon by others, they did not demonstrate that the Petitioner's contributions were of major significance in the field of physics. The expert letters lacked specificity about concrete impact, the citation comparisons lacked proper context, and citation rankings alone were insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_20_B2203; source_row=25638 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's unexplained finding, concluding that editorial board duties were indistinguishable from routine peer review, the publishers' distinguished reputations were not established, committee chair evidence largely post-dated filing, and invitations for future roles do not satisfy the requirement to have already performed in a leading or critical role.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's unexplained finding, concluding that editorial board duties were indistinguishable from routine peer review, the publishers' distinguished reputations were not established, committee chair evidence largely post-dated filing, and invitations for future roles do not satisfy the requirement to have already performed in a leading or critical role.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_13_B2203; source_row=25600 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The CDC Champion Award was received nearly a year after the May 2018 petition filing date, so it cannot establish eligibility as of the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The CDC Champion Award was received nearly a year after the May 2018 petition filing date, so it cannot establish eligibility as of the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_13_B2203; source_row=25596 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's unexplained finding, concluding that the Petitioner's citation figures, partial WHO documentation, low Altmetric score (55th percentile), and unsupported expert letters did not establish contributions of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's unexplained finding, concluding that the Petitioner's citation figures, partial WHO documentation, low Altmetric score (55th percentile), and unsupported expert letters did not establish contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_13_B2203; source_row=25598 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the individual in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Several articles lacked identification of publication name or date, the American Ideals magazine was not shown to be major media, the book review was not about the Petitioner and not in qualifying media, and circulation claims for The Standard were sourced from Wikipedia and unsupported by probative evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Several articles lacked identification of publication name or date, the American Ideals magazine was not shown to be major media, the book review was not about the Petitioner and not in qualifying media, and circulation claims for The Standard were sourced from Wikipedia and unsupported by probative evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_01_B2203; source_row=25530 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the award may be recognized within the Roman Catholic community, the record does not establish that it is awarded for excellence in the Petitioner's field of endeavor; submitted recipient biographies indicate the award is given for service to the Catholic Church rather than for excellence in any particular field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the award may be recognized within the Roman Catholic community, the record does not establish that it is awarded for excellence in the Petitioner's field of endeavor; submitted recipient biographies indicate the award is given for service to the Catholic Church rather than for excellence in any particular field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_01_B2203; source_row=25529 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
one-time major internationally recognized achievement
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner relied largely on Wikipedia, which is given no evidentiary weight, and failed to show the award is covered by international media, recognized by the general public, or comparable to awards like the Nobel Prize.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner relied largely on Wikipedia, which is given no evidentiary weight, and failed to show the award is covered by international media, recognized by the general public, or comparable to awards like the Nobel Prize.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_01_B2203; source_row=25528 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences16 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner's limited peer review record, modest citation counts, single burst of media attention in 2014, and lack of broader field recognition from applied neuroscience work did not collectively establish the sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing required for EB-1A classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's limited peer review record, modest citation counts, single burst of media attention in 2014, and lack of broader field recognition from applied neuroscience work did not collectively establish the sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing required for EB-1A classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_04_B2203; source_row=25551 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c