Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13201–13210
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AIEngineer
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that leading a team within a company does not constitute a leading or critical role for the organization as a whole, and that excellence on specific projects does not translate to an organizational-level leading or critical role. AAO also noted that conflating contributions with leading/critical role would collapse two distinct criteria into one.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that leading a team within a company does not constitute a leading or critical role for the organization as a whole, and that excellence on specific projects does not translate to an organizational-level leading or critical role. AAO also noted that conflating contributions with leading/critical role would collapse two distinct criteria into one.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_10_B2203; source_row=25582 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that programs alone do not establish the leading or critical nature of the Petitioner's roles, that teaching positions are not inherently critical at the organizational level, that her own dance company's distinguished reputation was not established, and that her role at the Foundation amounted to an assistant-level position rather than a leading or critical one. Promotional materials were discounted as self-serving.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that programs alone do not establish the leading or critical nature of the Petitioner's roles, that teaching positions are not inherently critical at the organizational level, that her own dance company's distinguished reputation was not established, and that her role at the Foundation amounted to an assistant-level position rather than a leading or critical one. Promotional materials were discounted as self-serving.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_16_B2203; source_row=25614 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that most submitted articles do not qualify as being 'about' the Petitioner, that articles which do focus on her did not appear in major media, and that one article lacked an identified author as required. The TV appearance was brief and incidental, and other online sources were blogs or promotional materials.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that most submitted articles do not qualify as being 'about' the Petitioner, that articles which do focus on her did not appear in major media, and that one article lacked an identified author as required. The TV appearance was brief and incidental, and other online sources were blogs or promotional materials.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_16_B2203; source_row=25611 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The limited documentation reflects that the fellowship was established for Ph.D. students, and the Petitioner did not provide independent evidence regarding the number of applicants, scope of eligible applicants, or selection criteria. Academic awards received while preparing for a vocation generally do not constitute nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The limited documentation reflects that the fellowship was established for Ph.D. students, and the Petitioner did not provide independent evidence regarding the number of applicants, scope of eligible applicants, or selection criteria. Academic awards received while preparing for a vocation generally do not constitute nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_09_B2203; source_row=25574 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The evidence does not demonstrate that Sigma Xi requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. The 'noteworthy achievement' standard requires only authorship of two papers, and the record does not establish the nomination and election process or that it imposes additional qualitative criteria amounting to an 'outstanding achievement' requirement.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence does not demonstrate that Sigma Xi requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. The 'noteworthy achievement' standard requires only authorship of two papers, and the record does not establish the nomination and election process or that it imposes additional qualitative criteria amounting to an 'outstanding achievement' requirement. The editorial board and reviewer roles also do not satisfy this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_09_B2203; source_row=25575 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Environment / Energy6 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The testimonial letters confirmed the originality of the Petitioner's techniques but did not establish that his contributions have been widely implemented, remarkably impactful, or recognized as majorly significant. Citation numbers were modest and no comparative data was provided. NASA funding and media coverage from the Petitioner's own university did not establish major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The testimonial letters confirmed the originality of the Petitioner's techniques but did not establish that his contributions have been widely implemented, remarkably impactful, or recognized as majorly significant. Citation numbers were modest and no comparative data was provided. NASA funding and media coverage from the Petitioner's own university did not establish major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_09_B2203; source_row=25578 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The El Espectador article lacked a properly certified translation and the Petitioner failed to establish El Espectador qualifies as major media. The El Tiempo article was only partially translated and contained only two sentences about the Petitioner, so it was not about him. The Remezcla article was sufficiently about the Petitioner but the Petitioner failed to establish Remezcla qualifies as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The El Espectador article lacked a properly certified translation and the Petitioner failed to establish El Espectador qualifies as major media. The El Tiempo article was only partially translated and contained only two sentences about the Petitioner, so it was not about him. The Remezcla article was sufficiently about the Petitioner but the Petitioner failed to establish Remezcla qualifies as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_17_B2203; source_row=25616 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because YouTube views do not constitute sales of recorded music, and the gold and platinum record evidence was insufficiently documented due to lack of properly certified translations and absence of primary evidence from the certifying body or record label. Even if translations had been proper, no comparative sales evidence was provided.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because YouTube views do not constitute sales of recorded music, and the gold and platinum record evidence was insufficiently documented due to lack of properly certified translations and absence of primary evidence from the certifying body or record label. Even if translations had been proper, no comparative sales evidence was provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_17_B2203; source_row=25619 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherEngineer
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO declined to make a formal final merits determination given the failure at step 1, but indicated in dicta that the aggregate record would not support sustained acclaim or top-of-the-field status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to make a formal final merits determination given the failure at step 1, but indicated in dicta that the aggregate record would not support sustained acclaim or top-of-the-field status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_08_B2203; source_row=25573 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO concluded that the Petitioner received only a participation certificate from NARAS, not a Grammy statuette or Grammy Award, and that the certificate was not shown to be comparable in recognition to the Grammy itself; the engineering category Petitioner worked under was for performance/song, not engineering.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that the Petitioner received only a participation certificate from NARAS, not a Grammy statuette or Grammy Award, and that the certificate was not shown to be comparable in recognition to the Grammy itself; the engineering category Petitioner worked under was for performance/song, not engineering.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_08_B2203; source_row=25572 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c