Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13221–13230
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record adequately supports the Director's determination and contains sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the Petitioner enjoys a distinguished reputation in its niche industry of architectural metalworking.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record adequately supports the Director's determination and contains sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the Petitioner enjoys a distinguished reputation in its niche industry of architectural metalworking.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_19_B2203; source_row=25633 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record demonstrates the Beneficiary has displayed his work at national blacksmith exhibitions and other events qualifying as artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record demonstrates the Beneficiary has displayed his work at national blacksmith exhibitions and other events qualifying as artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_19_B2203; source_row=25632 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Beneficiary's early career activities did not reflect national or international acclaim; there is a significant gap in the record from the mid-2000s to 2015; the acclaim for his most notable award-winning work accrued to his employer; and the expert letters recited statutory language without sufficient explanation or corroboration.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary's early career activities did not reflect national or international acclaim; there is a significant gap in the record from the mid-2000s to 2015; the acclaim for his most notable award-winning work accrued to his employer; and the expert letters recited statutory language without sufficient explanation or corroboration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_19_B2203; source_row=25635 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Director found this criterion satisfied based on the Petitioner's co-authored articles in peer-reviewed journals, and AAO did not disturb that finding.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Director found this criterion satisfied based on the Petitioner's co-authored articles in peer-reviewed journals, and AAO did not disturb that finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_20_B2203; source_row=25637 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
PhysicsPhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to formally conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, though it noted in the alternative that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to formally conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, though it noted in the alternative that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_20_B2203; source_row=25639 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim. The editorial board memberships largely reflect connections to a single open-source publisher and do not independently demonstrate acclaim. Published work and conference presentations are integral elements of scientific research, not elite privileges, and the Petitioner's citation metrics do not show she is at the very top of her field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim. The editorial board memberships largely reflect connections to a single open-source publisher and do not independently demonstrate acclaim. Published work and conference presentations are integral elements of scientific research, not elite privileges, and the Petitioner's citation metrics do not show she is at the very top of her field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_13_B2203; source_row=25601 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c