Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13231–13240
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences16 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
performance in a leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the organization distinguished itself in its market segment by winning awards, receiving 'App of the Year' honors, and receiving media coverage for its products and partnerships.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the organization distinguished itself in its market segment by winning awards, receiving 'App of the Year' honors, and receiving media coverage for its products and partnerships.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_04_B2203; source_row=25550 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences16 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
AAO did not separately rule on this criterion at step 1, addressing it instead in the final merits determination where it found the evidence insufficient to show major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately rule on this criterion at step 1, addressing it instead in the final merits determination where it found the evidence insufficient to show major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_04_B2203; source_row=25548 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences16 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the articles focus on the petitioner's own published study, with the petitioner quoted extensively and providing commentary on his research methods and findings.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the articles focus on the petitioner's own published study, with the petitioner quoted extensively and providing commentary on his research methods and findings.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_04_B2203; source_row=25546 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI107 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high remuneration for services
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Director's denial insufficiently explained and agreed with the Petitioner that the salary evidence—including sources from USCIS's own Adjudicator's Field Manual—was sufficient to show high remuneration relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's denial insufficiently explained and agreed with the Petitioner that the salary evidence—including sources from USCIS's own Adjudicator's Field Manual—was sufficient to show high remuneration relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_05_B2203; source_row=25557 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO reversed the Director, finding that as a LARAS voting member, the Petitioner votes among nominees for Latin Grammy Awards, thus participating as a judge by having some influence over the selection of award winners.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the Director, finding that as a LARAS voting member, the Petitioner votes among nominees for Latin Grammy Awards, thus participating as a judge by having some influence over the selection of award winners.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_06_B2203; source_row=25562 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO did not address criterion (i) explicitly in its reversal analysis; it confirmed only criteria (iii), (iv), and (vii) were met, implicitly affirming the Director's denial of criterion (i).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not address criterion (i) explicitly in its reversal analysis; it confirmed only criteria (iii), (iv), and (vii) were met, implicitly affirming the Director's denial of criterion (i).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_06_B2203; source_row=25559 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c