Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Chemistry / Chemical EngineeringResearcher62 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Judging
participation as a judge of the work of others
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO confirmed the Petitioner met this criterion, noting his peer review of manuscripts for several journals including Optical Materials and Optics Letters.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO confirmed the Petitioner met this criterion, noting his peer review of manuscripts for several journals including Optical Materials and Optics Letters.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_03_B2203; source_row=25541 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical EngineeringResearcher62 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the initial evidentiary threshold, but noted in the alternative that the record does not establish sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the initial evidentiary threshold, but noted in the alternative that the record does not establish sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_03_B2203; source_row=25545 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the scholarly articles criterion based on his publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the scholarly articles criterion based on his publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_14_B2203; source_row=25604 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life SciencesPhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of at least three evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of at least three evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_14_B2203; source_row=25605 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence threshold, though it noted in passing that the aggregate record did not support the required level of acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence threshold, though it noted in passing that the aggregate record did not support the required level of acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_02_B2203; source_row=25539 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the criterion was met. The Petitioner served as a judge at multiple advertising competitions, including the Cyber Category of one program, the Creation Awards, and a festival sponsored by an association of advertising professionals.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the criterion was met. The Petitioner served as a judge at multiple advertising competitions, including the Cyber Category of one program, the Creation Awards, and a festival sponsored by an association of advertising professionals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_02_B2203; source_row=25536 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c