Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Ability to pay via totality of circumstances (Sonegawa factors)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's claim of a vacant nurse practitioner position was unsubstantiated, its total assets were not balanced against liabilities, its bank statement was incomplete and undated, and the proffered wage differed from the intended annual payment. None of the Sonegawa factors were satisfied.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's claim of a vacant nurse practitioner position was unsubstantiated, its total assets were not balanced against liabilities, its bank statement was incomplete and undated, and the proffered wage differed from the intended annual payment. None of the Sonegawa factors were satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-17_01_B5203; source_row=25527 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay via net income or net current assets
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's 2017 Form 1120S showed a net loss of $78,069 and net current liabilities of $23,829, so neither net income nor net current assets could support the proffered wage.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's 2017 Form 1120S showed a net loss of $78,069 and net current liabilities of $23,829, so neither net income nor net current assets could support the proffered wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-17_01_B5203; source_row=25526 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The only wage evidence was a single weekly pay statement from March 2019 with no W-2s submitted, so no conclusions could be drawn about wages paid across any full year since the priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The only wage evidence was a single weekly pay statement from March 2019 with no W-2s submitted, so no conclusions could be drawn about wages paid across any full year since the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-17_01_B5203; source_row=25525 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters showed the Petitioner built a successful and distinctive business, but the record did not demonstrate that his business model was adopted by others or had widespread impact. Supporting assertions about his impact on supercar sales and automotive expertise in China were not backed by objective documentary evidence, and local significance does not rise to the level of major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters showed the Petitioner built a successful and distinctive business, but the record did not demonstrate that his business model was adopted by others or had widespread impact. Supporting assertions about his impact on supercar sales and automotive expertise in China were not backed by objective documentary evidence, and local significance does not rise to the level of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_02_B2203; source_row=25512 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The comparator publications are not in Chinese or distributed in China, the relevant market for the [REDACTED] Evening News. Circulation must be considered in the proper market context, and the comparison does not establish major-media status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The comparator publications are not in Chinese or distributed in China, the relevant market for the [REDACTED] Evening News. Circulation must be considered in the proper market context, and the comparison does not establish major-media status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_05_B2203; source_row=25523 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The criterion focuses on requirements for membership, not relative skill of members. Petitioner relied largely on previously submitted evidence, and rating is separate from membership status within the AGA.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The criterion focuses on requirements for membership, not relative skill of members. Petitioner relied largely on previously submitted evidence, and rating is separate from membership status within the AGA.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_05_B2203; source_row=25522 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
New statements describing the competitions and awards do not constitute new evidence that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized; the underlying award evidence was already in the record.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
New statements describing the competitions and awards do not constitute new evidence that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized; the underlying award evidence was already in the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_03_B2203; source_row=25516 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
one-time major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
The motion did not present new evidence or argument that any award rises to the level of a major, internationally recognized award; submitted award evidence was already in the record.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The motion did not present new evidence or argument that any award rises to the level of a major, internationally recognized award; submitted award evidence was already in the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_03_B2203; source_row=25515 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The submitted books are introductory karate materials intended for students, not scholarly articles for learned persons in the field; they do not qualify under criterion (vi).
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The submitted books are introductory karate materials intended for students, not scholarly articles for learned persons in the field; they do not qualify under criterion (vi).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_03_B2203; source_row=25517 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c