Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The evidence cited was previously submitted with the initial filing and thus is not new. Reference to other previously submitted evidence does not meet the motion-to-reopen requirements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence cited was previously submitted with the initial filing and thus is not new. Reference to other previously submitted evidence does not meet the motion-to-reopen requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_05_B2203; source_row=25521 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
The Director acknowledged the Petitioner authored scholarly articles but found no proof of publication in qualifying media, and improperly compared citation counts. AAO found that the publications—including articles in professional magazines and conference proceedings, as well as books and book chapters—qualify as professional or major trade publications, and withdrew the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Director acknowledged the Petitioner authored scholarly articles but found no proof of publication in qualifying media, and improperly compared citation counts. AAO found that the publications—including articles in professional magazines and conference proceedings, as well as books and book chapters—qualify as professional or major trade publications, and withdrew the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_01_B2203; source_row=25505 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner claimed to meet this criterion on appeal; AAO did not explicitly reverse the Director's finding and ultimately found the overall petition failed at the final merits stage, implicitly affirming the Director's conclusion that this criterion was not independently established.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner claimed to meet this criterion on appeal; AAO did not explicitly reverse the Director's finding and ultimately found the overall petition failed at the final merits stage, implicitly affirming the Director's conclusion that this criterion was not independently established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_01_B2203; source_row=25508 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national/international acclaim, top of field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that although the Petitioner is an active and productive researcher and practitioner, the evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that she is among the small percentage at the very top of her field. Publication impact, reference letters, exhibition activity, and project contributions all fell short of establishing the required level of recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that although the Petitioner is an active and productive researcher and practitioner, the evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that she is among the small percentage at the very top of her field. Publication impact, reference letters, exhibition activity, and project contributions all fell short of establishing the required level of recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_01_B2203; source_row=25509 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
AAO did not reach the merits of this criterion; it remanded so the Director could analyze the new evidence under § 204.5(h)(3)(v) consistent with Kazarian's two-part review.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the merits of this criterion; it remanded so the Director could analyze the new evidence under § 204.5(h)(3)(v) consistent with Kazarian's two-part review.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_04_B2203; source_row=25518 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for a distinguished organization
Why the evidence was persuasive
The evidence establishes that the Petitioner, as founder, performed a leading role, and media reports demonstrate the club enjoys a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence establishes that the Petitioner, as founder, performed a leading role, and media reports demonstrate the club enjoys a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_02_B2203; source_row=25513 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold three-criteria requirement, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of the required sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold three-criteria requirement, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of the required sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_02_B2203; source_row=25514 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
While many translations were incomplete and many articles were posted on sub-pages of portals without sufficient evidence of their status as major media, at least some articles — such as an interview posted on autohome.com.cn — were sufficiently shown to have been published in major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While many translations were incomplete and many articles were posted on sub-pages of portals without sufficient evidence of their status as major media, at least some articles — such as an interview posted on autohome.com.cn — were sufficiently shown to have been published in major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_02_B2203; source_row=25510 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c