Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 1321–1330
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
commanding a high salary or other significantly high remuneration
What the decision said
Because the Director entirely failed to address this criterion and its supporting evidence, AAO remanded for full evaluation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Director entirely failed to address this criterion and its supporting evidence, AAO remanded for full evaluation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-26_01_B2203; source_row=43213 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
The Director entirely failed to address criterion (v) and the associated comparable evidence. AAO remanded, noting USCIS Policy Manual guidance that an Olympic coach whose athlete wins a medal under the coach's principal tutelage would likely constitute comparable evidence under this criterion.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Director entirely failed to address criterion (v) and the associated comparable evidence. AAO remanded, noting USCIS Policy Manual guidance that an Olympic coach whose athlete wins a medal under the coach's principal tutelage would likely constitute comparable evidence under this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-26_01_B2203; source_row=43211 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis incomplete because she did not evaluate whether the regulatory criterion readily applies to the Petitioner's occupation as a coach or whether the comparable evidence submitted was sufficient. The matter is remanded for full re-evaluation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis incomplete because she did not evaluate whether the regulatory criterion readily applies to the Petitioner's occupation as a coach or whether the comparable evidence submitted was sufficient. The matter is remanded for full re-evaluation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-26_01_B2203; source_row=43208 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO reserved its decision on the third prong, having found the endeavor lacked national importance under prong 1, making a ruling on prong 3 unnecessary to the ultimate decision. AAO rejected the Petitioner's argument that this was error, citing Bagamasbad.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved its decision on the third prong, having found the endeavor lacked national importance under prong 1, making a ruling on prong 3 unnecessary to the ultimate decision. AAO rejected the Petitioner's argument that this was error, citing Bagamasbad.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-26_10_B5203; source_row=43246 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed its prior appellate conclusion that the Petitioner's initial materials did not demonstrate that his endeavor would have broader implications beyond the organizations and clients he would directly serve, and that he had not shown plans to introduce novel methodologies or contribute to research and development in the market research and financial industries as a whole.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed its prior appellate conclusion that the Petitioner's initial materials did not demonstrate that his endeavor would have broader implications beyond the organizations and clients he would directly serve, and that he had not shown plans to introduce novel methodologies or contribute to research and development in the market research and financial industries as a whole. AAO also upheld its treatment of the new business plan as a material change that could not be considered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-26_10_B5203; source_row=43244 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO did not address prong 2 on this motion, consistent with its prior appeal decision which did not disturb the Director's favorable finding on this prong.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not address prong 2 on this motion, consistent with its prior appeal decision which did not disturb the Director's favorable finding on this prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-26_10_B5203; source_row=43245 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the high salary criterion because the Petitioner had already failed to meet the minimum threshold of three criteria, making any analysis of this criterion unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the high salary criterion because the Petitioner had already failed to meet the minimum threshold of three criteria, making any analysis of this criterion unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-26_02_B2203; source_row=43220 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner's job creation and revenue projections lacked sufficient evidentiary support, and that the proposed endeavor's impact did not extend beyond the specific clients the Petitioner would work with, failing to demonstrate the broad national-scale economic implications required for national importance under Dhanasar.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's job creation and revenue projections lacked sufficient evidentiary support, and that the proposed endeavor's impact did not extend beyond the specific clients the Petitioner would work with, failing to demonstrate the broad national-scale economic implications required for national importance under Dhanasar. The HUBZone argument was unpersuasive because the Petitioner did not adequately establish the SBA's criteria for HUBZones, and it appeared the Petitioner might not even qualify for the program.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-25_02_B5203; source_row=43191 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c