Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 13341–13350
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Court decisions and articles about cases are not about the Petitioner himself; the consulting firm articles do not mention the Petitioner; and the Times of India article and YouTube video, while naming the Petitioner, are about the legal issue rather than about him and his work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Court decisions and articles about cases are not about the Petitioner himself; the consulting firm articles do not mention the Petitioner; and the Times of India article and YouTube video, while naming the Petitioner, are about the legal issue rather than about him and his work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=25442 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters did not establish that the selection process for senior standing counsel required outstanding achievements as opposed to a certain set of skills and experience in tax litigation, and the Petitioner did not explain why this employment should be considered comparable to association membership.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters did not establish that the selection process for senior standing counsel required outstanding achievements as opposed to a certain set of skills and experience in tax litigation, and the Petitioner did not explain why this employment should be considered comparable to association membership.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=25441 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's claimed list of citing cases actually showed only results of a name search and did not demonstrate future impact; more fundamentally, defending an already-established legal position does not demonstrate originality, and the evidence did not establish that his advocacy role constituted original contributions to international tax law.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's claimed list of citing cases actually showed only results of a name search and did not demonstrate future impact; more fundamentally, defending an already-established legal position does not demonstrate originality, and the evidence did not establish that his advocacy role constituted original contributions to international tax law.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=25444 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to establish that his law firm's website qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium, and did not specifically address this issue in his RFE responses or on appeal.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to establish that his law firm's website qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium, and did not specifically address this issue in his RFE responses or on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=25445 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the poster published in the World Congress proceedings constitutes a scholarly article published in a professional medium, satisfying the plain language of this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the poster published in the World Congress proceedings constitutes a scholarly article published in a professional medium, satisfying the plain language of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_03_B2203; source_row=25448 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the criterion was not met. While the Petitioner led a team and contributed to product development at a distinguished employer, the evidence did not show he acted as a leader for the overall organization of 22,000+ employees, nor that his contribution was critical to the organization's overall success or activities.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the criterion was not met. While the Petitioner led a team and contributed to product development at a distinguished employer, the evidence did not show he acted as a leader for the overall organization of 22,000+ employees, nor that his contribution was critical to the organization's overall success or activities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_03_B2203; source_row=25449 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
The reference letters sufficiently established that the Petitioner played a critical role for his employer in implementing the application and integrating it with other systems, and the record sufficiently demonstrated that the employer enjoys a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters sufficiently established that the Petitioner played a critical role for his employer in implementing the application and integrating it with other systems, and the record sufficiently demonstrated that the employer enjoys a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_01_B2203; source_row=25438 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required showing of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required showing of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_01_B2203; source_row=25440 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not establish that minimum experiential qualifications and payment of dues are achievements demonstrating a candidate stands out from peers, that exam completion constitutes an outstanding achievement, or that candidates are judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not establish that minimum experiential qualifications and payment of dues are achievements demonstrating a candidate stands out from peers, that exam completion constitutes an outstanding achievement, or that candidates are judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_01_B2203; source_row=25435 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c