Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The studio certificate was only an internal employee award with no national/international recognition. The Division-level award lacked sufficient evidence of recognition outside the company, and there was no evidence the team won the award (only that it was nominated). The newly submitted contest first-place prize lacked evidence establishing the level of recognition associated with the competition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The studio certificate was only an internal employee award with no national/international recognition. The Division-level award lacked sufficient evidence of recognition outside the company, and there was no evidence the team won the award (only that it was nominated). The newly submitted contest first-place prize lacked evidence establishing the level of recognition associated with the competition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-17_01_B2203; source_row=25405 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
There was no evidence of a written component to the thesis project, the video thesis was not published in professional/major trade publications or major media, and the employer artwork was not scholarly articles for learned persons nor published in qualifying media.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
There was no evidence of a written component to the thesis project, the video thesis was not published in professional/major trade publications or major media, and the employer artwork was not scholarly articles for learned persons nor published in qualifying media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-17_01_B2203; source_row=25410 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
Current U.S. employment post-dated filing; comparable wage data covered broad fields rather than textile embroidery artists; teaching wages were in a different field; and no comparable evidence was offered for art sales.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Current U.S. employment post-dated filing; comparable wage data covered broad fields rather than textile embroidery artists; teaching wages were in a different field; and no comparable evidence was offered for art sales.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-17_02_B2203; source_row=25425 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
The kvira.ge article post-dated filing; other items lacked required title/date/author info, were not 'about' the Petitioner, or did not show major media status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The kvira.ge article post-dated filing; other items lacked required title/date/author info, were not 'about' the Petitioner, or did not show major media status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-17_02_B2203; source_row=25421 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found Petitioner did not show the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and the supporting letters lacked specific, detailed justification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found Petitioner did not show the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and the supporting letters lacked specific, detailed justification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-17_02_B2203; source_row=25419 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherEngineer
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the record demonstrated substantial merit in the Petitioner's field, it did not show that her specific proposed endeavor would impact production engineering or the U.S. manufacturing industry more broadly. Her work was confined to her employer's operations and she did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects attributable to her specific work.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
While the record demonstrated substantial merit in the Petitioner's field, it did not show that her specific proposed endeavor would impact production engineering or the U.S. manufacturing industry more broadly. Her work was confined to her employer's operations and she did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects attributable to her specific work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-17_01_B5203; source_row=25416 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three initial evidentiary criteria. AAO nonetheless observed in the aggregate that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three initial evidentiary criteria. AAO nonetheless observed in the aggregate that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-17_01_B2203; source_row=25415 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c